I'm too busy to do that math. But if column B adds to 29, and column C adds to 21.9, then sure it's like that. Except they would probably round up C to 22.@RBHeadge PE, @jean15paul_PE So like this for an example session (but normally done for the entire exam):
Question #
Right/Wrong
Cut Weight
1
1
0.2
2
1
1.0
3
1
0.4
4
0
0.1
5
1
0.6
6
0
0.6
7
1
0.2
8
0
0.4
9
0
0.9
10
1
0.7
11
1
0.9
12
1
0.2
13
0
0.6
14
1
0.6
15
1
1.0
16
1
0.1
17
1
0.6
18
0
0.5
19
1
0.7
20
0
0.6
21
1
0.8
22
1
0.9
23
1
0.3
24
1
0.5
25
1
0.9
26
0
0.4
27
1
0.7
28
1
0.7
29
1
1.0
30
0
0.3
31
1
0.4
32
0
0.5
33
1
0.6
34
1
0.2
35
1
0.3
36
1
0.8
37
1
0.2
38
1
0.5
39
1
0.6
40
0
0.4
Ā
29
21.9
Ā
Exam Score
Cut Score
So for April 2018 exams & after, they changed the exam spec for the Power PE. It's the one you see on their website today."exam specification" - What do you mean by this? Like, are all the questions in the bank a "specification" or is morning session A + afternoon session C a "specificaiton"?
Wait how did you get the real cut score for October's power exam?!they determine the cut score is 68 (out of 80) based on the difficulty and expectations for each question. Once that cut score is determined,Ā you have to get 68 right to pass. It doesn't matter if your 68 points come fromĀ easy questions or hard questions. They all count the same toward your pass/fail.
You would only know that was the real cut score IF YOU WERE MAFIA!!!!ĀWait how did you get the real cut score for October's power exam?!
Yeah they add up (Excel table).I'm too busy to do that math. But if column B adds to 29, and column C adds to 21.9, then sure it's like that. Except they would probably round up C to 22.
That's what I'm wondering.So the cut score meeting determines the weighting for an entire question bank, which is some number of problems much greater than 80?Ā Then each administration pulls from that bank to created different tests?
I'll add that they update the codes in the exam specifications all the time. Those updates don't precipitate a new cut score meeting.the exam spec did not include NFPA 70E, NPFA 30B, NFPA 497, NFPA 499.
The bank is certainly larger than 80 questions.Ā which is some number of problems much greater than 80?
yesThen each administration pulls from that bank to created different tests?
And a survey design meeting precedes the PAKS meeting. The survey is sent to active PEs in that field.Ā The survey results informs the PAKS meeting.
- Professional Activities and Knowledge Study (PAKS) is used to develop the exam specification, and according to NCEES:Ā āThe results of this online survey will be sued to update specifications for the exam, which is used throughout the United States for licensing purposes.ā
Technically it's not a committee meeting. Non-committee members are required to participate in some number to avoid bias, group-think, etc.
- The passing score weight of each question is is determined during an in-person committee meeting?
I did not know this. I thought each exam was created, evaluated, and cut score determined individually. Creating one large bank based on the specification makes a lot of sense.The bank is certainly larger than 80 questions.
yes
They did plenty of other things to the Power exam spec for April 2018, the codes are the easiest thing to remember. i know Zach Stone has an article about all of the changes on his site somewhere but I'm lazy and others can google it if they wanna know all of the nitty grittyI'll add that they update the codes in the exam specifications all the time. Those updates don't precipitate a new cut score meeting.
really hope not lolWait how did you get the real cut score for October's power exam?!
Short answer, it's basically the PE committee of the respective engineering society.Another question: Who creates the questions? I ask because Louisiana will give you CPD hours for "problem preparation for a NCEES or state professional engineering or land surveying exam."
Enter your email address to join: