ok, so I'm going to write this analysis as if I were a neutral third party observer. I sort feel that way because I've been so busy with RL work, and helping out the waiting no0bz.
This analysis uses the best available public knowledge as of noon today. I will not (read: can't) include anything that may or may not have been going on outside of this thread.
mafia = lycee; not mafia = cheb . The roles of the other players are unknown at this time.
I will assume that the mafia behaves rationally, insofar as they wouldn't vote for one of their own when it mattered.
So here's my analysis of yesterday's vote:
first vote:
cheb votes for square; cheb was not mafia so assume this was a blind shot. No determination can be made about any player
second vote:
leggo votes for lycee; Since lycee is mafia, and mafia wouldn't put one of their own in a position to be eliminated, lets call leggo=not mafia
third vote:
txjen votes square; Below I'll show that square is not mafia, but in this case and time, we can't confirm that txjen knew this (she could be townie taking a random shot, or mafia protecting mafia), so txjen=?
fourth vote
tj votes txjen; at this moment there is nothing in the public sphere which by itself that can be inferred from this vote.
fifth vote
square votes lycee; mafia won't put one of their own in a position to be eliminated - which is what this vote will do, so square=not mafia
sixth vote
lycee votes square; no new conclusions
seventh vote
tj changes vote to lycee; mafia won't put one of their own in a position to be eliminated - which this vote has the potential to do, so tj=not mafia
eighth vote
rb votes lycee; mafia won't vote out one of their own, this is a tiebreaking vote under any cicumstance so rb=not mafia
ninth vote
bly votes jean; nothing can be cleanly inferred from this vote
tenth vote
cheb changes vote to lycee; OBE
So based on this sequence of events. We can confirm without a cop that the following players are not mafia:
leggo, square, tj, rb
Everyone else is still a question mark
Based on the above, the narrative that txjen is providing is consistent with her being a townie who took a random shot. However it is also consistent with the theory that she was mafia and trying to protect her fellow mafiosa lycee. Either theory is valid using logical inference. One would have to use other, potentially less reliable, methods to make a determination on txjen's motives for her vote and her role in the game.