Nope. I wish IĀ could tell you other wise.By any chance, can the cut off for passing be 50 or less than 50? What do you guys think? I'm new to the forum
But itās safe to assume 75% is passing. So, you can miss 20 questions and pass.
Nope. I wish IĀ could tell you other wise.By any chance, can the cut off for passing be 50 or less than 50? What do you guys think? I'm new to the forum
Very close to my experience, even on references. I definitely did better on the morning session though.Pretty much the morning and afternoon sessions were the same for me.
A few WTF type questions which I expected. Some straight forward, others were educated guesses and the others were complete guesses. I would say I knew about 3/4 of the exam material. The other 1/8 were educated guesses and the other 1/8 were complete guesses. This is pretty spot on to what others have said with previous exams.
For the straight forward questions, my muscle memory kicked in but still confirmed it with some references like Wildi, Graffeo and Eng Pro Guides. Educated guesses were made based on reading reference material and eliminating choices. My most used references were NEC, Wildi, Graffeo, EngProGuides and NESC in order of importance. A few uses of my IEEE Green Book and Power Systems Analysis book but not that much. My school of PE notes were kind of useless. They were too generic based on the questions asked.
Lots of qualitative questions and not so much quantitative. I feel 50/50 about it. 50% I passed and 50% I failed. It can go either way.Ā I guess time will tell. I'm just disappointed most of what I studied really wasn't covered. That's all I can say about that. Just don't give up hope people. It isn't over until it's over.
Yes same here. Afternoon was slightly easier for me. I just want to pass. These days I rarely want anything out of life. This would be one of the biggest things I want. I don't want to go through the whole procedure again.Finally someone spoke what I felt. Even I felt that first and second half were equally difficult for me. In fact I felt second half was better than the first half which I felt was really bad. But was surprised to c everyone saying otherwise. For some reason, I didn't count the questions I answered confidently. So unable to get an estimate of how much I may score. But honestly not having a huge hope on the exam. But I have seen everyone telling that the exam was difficult and they have no hopes on passing but still end up passing the exam. Hope the same thing happens to me
If it's not graded in a curve, then why is there no set passing score?Ā If there was a set passing score/%, it would make sense to run the answer sheets through a computer (scantron) and we would have our results in a day or two.Ā There would be nothing to analyze.ĀPack_Man said:I thought the morning was a little better but they were pretty close. Ā The afternoon session started great butĀ then the questions got tough real quick. LuckilyĀ a huge chunk of the end of both sectionsĀ was relaying/protection stuff which I know like the back of my hand because thatās what I do for work.Ā
Iām kicking myself because I know I got 5-6 questions wrong having looked up the answers afterwards or noticing something during the afternoon session that sheddedĀ light on a morning question. Ā QualitativeĀ questions, of course. Ā In addition, I flat out guessed on 2-3. Ā The rest are a spectrum of totallyĀ confident to somewhat confident. Ā I feel pretty good about getting more than 56Ā right which from what Iāve read should be good enough but weāll just have to see. Ā This isnāt graded on a curve so hopingĀ the best for you all!
Seems to hover around 56 correct answers.Ā Sometimes a little more or less depending upon the difficulty of the exam.What do you guys realistically think the cutoff score is?Ā
I guess its gonna be 50.My intuition is mostly right in many things.Let us see after 6 weeks if I amĀ Ā right.Remember my name if I am rightWhat do you guys realistically think the cutoff score is?Ā
Your name is not Baconator.Ā You do not pass go.ĀI guess its gonna be 50.My intuition is mostly right in many things.Let us see after 6 weeks if I amĀ Ā right.Remember my name if I am right
Just calm down buddy...If it's not graded in a curve, then why is there no set passing score?Ā If there was a set passing score/%, it would make sense to run the answer sheets through a computer (scantron) and we would have our results in a day or two.Ā There would be nothing to analyze.Ā
Based on your experience what do you think how to prepare best for a April 2019 examinee?I studied for about 7 months. Took a review course, took 9 practice tests, basically studied a lot.I was feeling very prepared going in to the test.Ā
The morning was ok, felt unsure of about 6-8 questions.Ā
Afternoon was tough. Felt unsure of about 9-10 questions.Ā
Now I feel a little discouraged.Ā
Most likely. We've seen a cut score about 56 a couple times before though.If u r expecting More than 56 and you'll pass dude.
Welcome to Phase 2-A! The thread below should provide some decent background for everything you described:Pack_Man said:From what I can gather,Ā the final cutĀ score is determined afterĀ evaluating all theĀ resultsĀ to findĀ things like errors, badĀ question wording, or multiple correct answers. Ā Speculating a bit, I would wager a tentative cut score is set prior to the test based on how PEās do on it (or whatever criteria) but they still want to do their due diligence with all the results data available to adjust that if appropriate. Ā Hell, maybe this happens after the test as well since it takes so damn long to get our results back.Ā
See thread above. For background only: we've seen cut scores from ~52/53 to 57, from after the fact posts. Since we don't have hard data for every test we can't do the statistics, but anecdotally the mean, median, and mode is below 56. Rarely is it ever 56 or higher. Take all of this with a huge grain of salt.Seems to hover around 56 correct answers.Ā Sometimes a little more or less depending upon the difficulty of the exam.
See above.I guess its gonna be 50.My intuition is mostly right in many things.Let us see after 6 weeks if I amĀ Ā right.Remember my name if I am right
Ya buddy. I'm not making a blind assumption. Texas gives u percentage. And NCEES gives a diagnostic report if you fail. The number I gave you was from what I heard from someone who failed at Texas last time. I've seen some posts in this forum too. And still. V will know in 40 more days.ĀMost likely. We've seen a cut score about 56 a couple times before though.
Welcome to Phase 2-A! The thread below should provide some decent background for everything you described:
The EE exams already had their cut score meetings. So unless things are wildly off (don't bet on it), the EEower isn't the cause of a 'delay'.
See thread above. For background only: we've seen cut scores from ~52/53 to 57, from after the fact posts. Since we don't have hard data for every test we can't do the statistics, but anecdotally the mean, median, and mode is below 56. Rarely is it ever 56 or higher. Take all of this with a huge grain of salt.
See above.
I started off with Zach Stone's course. Made a custom binder for myself organized with the course materials. Tabbed the NEC book, and obtained the remaining code books (didn't tab those). Then started practice tests.ĀBased on your experience what do you think how to prepare best for a April 2019 examinee?
56/80Ā 70%ĀI am also kind of surprised how many people were saying the morning session went well. For me, the morning session was a massacre and the afternoon session was so much easier. I guarantee I was at least 10 questions more correct on the afternoon session than the morning. I'm also kicking myself knowing a few questions I answered incorrectly and highly doubtful I passed but there's not much I can do about it now.Ā
Also, when others on this board are saying a "cut score" of 56, are they referring to a hard cutoff pass/fail for 56/80 or 56/100?
Enter your email address to join: