Everything you wanted to know about the CA-Survey/Seismic Civil PE Exams

Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum

Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Hey everyone just took seismic felt better this time

i got answer for like 34/55 I feel for sure solid on most of those and the others maybe 5 were 50-50 and rest kinda guesses maybe some educatedĀ 

will ipass lol šŸ˜­hope i tried so hard to study. EET twice now

 
Hey everyone just took seismic felt better this time

i got answer for like 34/55 I feel for sure solid on most of those and the others maybe 5 were 50-50 and rest kinda guesses maybe some educatedĀ 

will ipass lol šŸ˜­hope i tried so hard to study. EET twice now
Good luck man, hope you make it this time.Ā 

 
So I passed both CA Seismic and Surveying exams, but not the 8-hour yet, but I received an email saying that I am now a registered Civil Engineer in the State of CA.Ā How did this happen? Well I had registered for all three exams prior the new regulations took place. I took Surveying and Seismic first, passed surveying and not seismic. Then I took Seismic and the 8-hour, failed both.Ā Then I retook both again and passed Seismic, not the 8-hour (again). So I registered for the 8-hour, and a week later I received an email from BPELSG stating that I am now registered CE. I do not know how this happened if I haven't passed the 8-hour. Any thoughts? I

I also contacted the board to make sure it wasn't a mistakeĀ and they said I am registered now.

Thanks.Ā 

 
So I passed both CA Seismic and Surveying exams, but not the 8-hour yet, but I received an email saying that I am now a registered Civil Engineer in the State of CA.Ā How did this happen? Well I had registered for all three exams prior the new regulations took place. I took Surveying and Seismic first, passed surveying and not seismic. Then I took Seismic and the 8-hour, failed both.Ā Then I retook both again and passed Seismic, not the 8-hour (again). So I registered for the 8-hour, and a week later I received an email from BPELSG stating that I am now registered CE. I do not know how this happened if I haven't passed the 8-hour. Any thoughts? I

I also contacted the board to make sure it wasn't a mistakeĀ and they said I am registered now.

Thanks.Ā 
Did you check your name here for confirmation?Ā https://search.dca.ca.gov/

 
Yes I did, and my name and license number are there. However, it expires June 2019. This year. Kind of weird.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes I did, and my name and license number are there. However, it expires June 2019. This year. Kind of weird.
Edit: Didn't read the part about not taking the 8-hour yet. Guessing it's because in the new system you're supposed to have passed the 8-hour prior to taking seismic and surveying.Ā 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow! This the most wiredĀ thing I have ever heard. SurelyĀ @CAPLS has an explanation.Ā 
Thanks. I will ask @CAPLSĀ for an explanation. I will take the exam this upcoming April just in case. I am going to study for it this time. Funny how I was able to pass the two harder exams but not the "easier" one.Ā 

 
Thanks. I will ask @CAPLSĀ for an explanation. I will take the exam this upcoming April just in case. I am going to study for it this time. Funny how I was able to pass the two harder exams but not the "easier" one.Ā 
Yeah, this sounds very strange to me. I'm thinking it is a clerical error.

I was in your same situation before I became a CA P.E., where I passed the seismic and surveying exams before I passed the 8 hour P.E. exam. I didn't get a license number until it passed the 8 hour.

 
Yes I did, and my name and license number are there. However, it expires June 2019. This year. Kind of weird.
Out of curiosity what materials did you use for surveying? If you took per test plan 2018,

What I believe happened is that isĀ  systemĀ  messed up, they added Ā your name to the ā€œNew System ā€œ matrix, I.e: the candidates who have PASS forĀ surveying and seismic next to their namesĀ become license engineer,Ā because per new system you canā€™t sit to take seismic and surveying without passing the 8hours and your the application got approved by the board. This is the only logical explanation.Ā 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Out of curiosity what materials did you use for surveying? If you took per test plan 2018,

What I believe happened is that is messed up, they added Ā your name to the ā€œNew System ā€œ mattrix, I.e: the candidates who have PASS forĀ surveying and seismic next to their namesĀ become license engineer,Ā because per new system you canā€™t sit to take seismic and surveying without passing the 8hours and your the application got approved by the board. This is the only logic explanation.Ā 
I took an 18-hour seminar with John Pavlik, held in Irvine CA by the Irvine Institute of Technology. Here's the linkĀ http://irvine-institute.org/seismic-principles-spring-schedule-2018/

Really great course, he also does it live if you live far. He assigns homework and problems you should do before the next lecture. The classes alone, his manual, and the Surveying Principles book by CuomoĀ is all I used.

And I think you're right, like you said, I got adopted into the new system. Ā 

 
Yes I did, and my name and license number are there. However, it expires June 2019. This year. Kind of weird.
Sounds weird to me too. I agree with @vip-engĀ that it MAYĀ be a system screw up, wherein it assumes that you have passed the national exam. However, the requirement to pass theĀ national exam before being eligible to take the CA state exams is a fallacy. I was in constant touch with a senior licensing analyst from the board (a month ago) and she explained to me that taking and passing the national exam before the CA state examsĀ  is a recommendation and NOT a requirement. In other words, if you meet the eligibility criteria (education, experience, etc.), and your application has been accepted by the board, you will receive the ATT. I know they make it seem like a requirement, and I was a victim of this very sameĀ misunderstanding, and had to pay the re-examination fee without having taken the state exam.Ā 

Just hope it does not happen to anyone else.Ā 

 
Sounds weird to me too. I agree with @vip-engĀ that it MAYĀ be a system screw up, wherein it assumes that you have passed the national exam. However, the requirement to pass theĀ national exam before being eligible to take the CA state exams is a fallacy. I was in constant touch with a senior licensing analyst from the board (a month ago) and she explained to me that taking and passing the national exam before the CA state examsĀ  is a recommendation and NOT a requirement. In other words, if you meet the eligibility criteria (education, experience, etc.), and your application has been accepted by the board, you will receive the ATT. I know they make it seem like a requirement, and I was a victim of this very sameĀ misunderstanding, and had to pay the re-examination fee without having taken the state exam.Ā 

Just hope it does not happen to anyone else.Ā 
Hi, I got a bit confused towards the end of your comment. Basically, you passed both CA exams, but did not take/passthe 8-hour exam as well?

And you are correct, I have been reading and nowhere does it state that taking the 8-hour ISĀ a requirement, rather, you "should" take it and pass it before you take the CA exams. Here's an excerpt from Steve Hiner's website (Seismic Review Course, which I highly recommend):

Beginning with the April 2018 exam, there is aĀ NEWĀ process for applying for licensure as a Civil Engineer in California. Candidates "should" pass the 8-hour NCEES Civil Engineering Principles & Practice (P&P) exam before submitting an application for licensure in California.

The following four parts need to be successfully completed to be licensed as a Civil Engineer in the State of California. You DO NOT need to pass all parts at the same time (i.e., each part may be passed separately from the other parts).

  • Part I: 8-hour NCEES Principles & Practice (P&P) ExaminationĀ - administered on a Friday in mid-April and late October ("should" pass before applying to take Parts II, III and IV below)
  • Part II: California P.E. State Laws and Board RulesĀ -Ā Take Home ExaminationĀ (submitted with application)
  • Part III: California Special Civil Engineering Surveying (CES) ExaminationĀ - two and one-half hours in length, all multiple-choice (continuous testing by quarter)
  • Part IV: California Special Civil Seismic Principles (CSP) ExaminationĀ - two and one-half hours in length, all multiple-choice (continuous testing by quarter)

 
Thanks. I will ask @CAPLSĀ for an explanation. I will take the exam this upcoming April just in case. I am going to study for it this time. Funny how I was able to pass the two harder exams but not the "easier" one.Ā 
I responded to your message.Ā  Good plan and better this is resolved sooner rather than later.

 
Back
Top