So far no one said today dead people couldn't comment. I feel the need to comment and clarify my actions last night. I will not reveal my role.mini dive on @Roarbark
There was a three-way tie in the final hour last night. Between @LyceeFruit PE, @Roarbark, @ChebyshevII PE
Neither @Roarbark or @LyceeFruit PE had voted at that point. @ChebyshevII PE was among the voters in the tie.
Lycee was a townie.
Let's explore this from @Roarbark's viewpoint:
He is active and threatened in a tie. He could vote for @ChebyshevII PE or @LyceeFruit PE to break the tie. Or go with 2/3 odds of success.
Assume that @Roarbark is townie.
If he votes for @ChebyshevII PE, then an active @ChebyshevII PE votes for him our of self-preservation. Vote is now roar 3, cheb 3, his odds decease to 50/50 for a tie
Or he votes for @LyceeFruit PE, vote is now lycee 3, roar 2, cheb 2. It's more reliable, but @LyceeFruit PE could sign on vote for him or cheb out of self preservation. Assume equal weighting, and he has 75% chance of success. He if gamed it out and assumed that nothing else pertured the system, then this scenario is his best play.
But not everyone games things out, but he also wasn't given much time to game things out either.
Assume @Roarbark is mafia.
The odds above still apply if he votes for @ChebyshevII PE or @LyceeFruit PE. But there is also the possibility that he doesn't want to vote for cheb because he is also maf. If that's the case then voting for @LyceeFruit PE is his statistical best play. The intangible here is that maybe he doesn't want to establish a connection with @ChebyshevII PE, although his vote could have been easily spun as a CYA vote.
Now of course, the tie was broken quickly by @DuranDuran. Which may not have given @Roarbark the opportunity to make a move. We'll never know what may have happened if @DuranDuran hadn't switched. In actuality last night, it looked like @Roarbark held back just in case he needed to do something.
tl;dr The event analysis is inconclusive.
See below from page 673. This is 2 posts before my vote. Before I voted, it was my understanding there was a 2-way tie between @LyceeFruit PE and @ChebyshevII PE with @Roarbark having three votes. There were a couple of players I had my eye on, and I wasn't feeling good about the outcome. My intention was to generate a reaction from other players and see the outcome. If there had been a 3-way tie as @RBHeadge PE and others have suggested, I might have voted differently or not at all. I was looking at the below update when I voted.