I'm curious as to when you sat for the CA Engineering Surveying exam that gave you a reason for thinking the content is archaic and what modern surveying methods are not being tested on? I realize that certain technological tools have evolved to the point of almost not needing a person there, or at best case, just needing someone to personally standby so the equipment is not stolen. But how would the Board test someone on being competent to push a button?
GPS? - Can't test civil engineer applicants on the use of GPS because by its very nature, GPS takes into account the figure and shape of the earth's surface...which is land surveying and outside the scope of the surveying authority given to the civil engineers.
Drones? - this is simply photogrammetry using a vehicle with a remote pilot. Board does not test on software/hardware.
Scanners - just topographic surveying and Board doesn't test on software/hardware.
The laws only allow civil engineers to perform construction staking and topographic surveys. Nothing more. When you remove the technological advances mentioned above, what else is there?
I do agree that error analysis does come into play with all these. Assuming you've passed this exam and now licensed/living in California...why not help write better questions by signing up to work on the exams? Link to do that is
Wanted: Expert Consultants to Assist with Examination Development - Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists The Board is always looking for more experts to work on the exams.