It doesn't mean anything, but they were a three loss team, and weren't that bad.I have never understood the "top 10 team at the time" that means nothing. Nebraska is garbage, that's like saying it means something that the Broncos beat the Panthers in the first game of the season, we now know that didn't mean as much today as it did 13 weeks ago..
But hopefully we all agree Washington State doesn't stand much of a chance...
For one, I won't sign up to the "Washington State doesn't stand much of a chance" mantra. I think Minnesota will have its work cut out for them. As for Top 10 team at the time. Of course that makes sense. Injuries happen, players start playing poorly due to distraction or whatever. Poor coaching decisions result in a loss in a close game. There's a host of issues that will make a team better at one time than another. Some teams get better as the season goes on, some get worse.I have never understood the "top 10 team at the time" that means nothing. Nebraska is garbage, that's like saying it means something that the Broncos beat the Panthers in the first game of the season, we now know that didn't mean as much today as it did 13 weeks ago..
But hopefully we all agree Washington State doesn't stand much of a chance...
Yeah, Washington has its work cut out for them. I don't think they will win, but I don't think it's going to be a cake walk either.my bad I mean to say (just) Washington..
Fixed it....Yeah, what's the over/under for [COLOR= rgb(255, 0, 0)]anyone caring if[/COLOR] the Holiday bowl even happening?
Fixed it....
On a more serious note as a follow-up: http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2016/12/17/minnesota-players-end-their-boycott-play-holiday-bowl/95554346/
The first article I read about the boycott was pretty bad. It didn't even mention the reason for the boycott or the suspensions until the very end, almost as a side note. The article in the link above was a lot better, although it makes me scratch my head. Sounds like some girl reported an assault and the police investigated and the county attorney's office didn't press charges because there was no evidence to prove an assault happened. So, how does the school come back and suspend 10 players anyway? I know schools always like to use the "athletes being held to a higher standard" line, but if the police and county attorney say there's no charges to press, then who is the school to say otherwise? Also, the articles say there were 4 players investigated. How did it end up being 10 getting suspended by the school?
Preach!I'm assuming they basically ***** some poor girl, but all they could "find evidence" for is they "student athletes" were out after curfew and using alcohol..
It would be nice to see more schools take this stand with their pre Madonna's!
Yeah no ****. I swam for the school and that money could've made one hell of a swim complex . See auburn Texas a&am georgia. Dumb *** *******. Yes I swam for LSULA state governor threatens to shut down LSU football? :huh: :Locolaugh:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/14764642/louisiana-gov-john-bel-edwards-threatens-future-lsu-tigers-football-tax-proposals-passed
However, I did find it amusing that LSU recently put in an 85 MILLION DOLLAR lazy river. Seems excessive...
He won't go anywhere, but there is going to be a lot of pressure on him to make big changes.Urban Meyer looked like he is ready for another "retirement" at his press conference
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: