knight1fox3
Jedi MASTER & Friend of Capt. Solo
^^^LOL!!!!
"Give me VAUGHN!"
"Give me VAUGHN!"
apparently the one in Houston can every once in a while...I just wonder if Jesus could hit a curve ball?
All interesting arguments to read but they will always end at an impasse. No one will ever prove or disprove the existence of a God through science
Thus why I'm agnostic. Does God exist? Maybe, maybe not; I have no way of knowing and thus it's irrelevant until provable evidence surfaces. That's my personal choice and everyone else is free to believe what they want, but I do think it's ridiculous to commit violence or wage wars over something that you can't even prove exists.
"C" as in Catholic?& always remember its the C students that run the world...
2.0 and go!& always remember its the C students that run the world...
Thus why I'm agnostic. Does God exist? Maybe, maybe not; I have no way of knowing and thus it's irrelevant until provable evidence surfaces. That's my personal choice and everyone else is free to believe what they want, but I do think it's ridiculous to commit violence or wage wars over something that you can't even prove exists.
This. I have never self-identified as atheist.
^Oh I completely disagree with you. Some (many?) atheists would be just as rabid about claiming a god doesn't exist even presented evidence that it did as many theists are in claiming god does exist given no proof. Whereas as an agnostic I really just don't care.
Being an atheist doesn't imply being rational. I'm sure there are lots of atheists who are not rational.
^Oh I completely disagree with you. Some (many?) atheists would be just as rabid about claiming a god doesn't exist even presented evidence that it did as many theists are in claiming god does exist given no proof. Whereas as an agnostic I really just don't care.
Well then, I disagree that you disagree! I don't think there is any reason to believe a rational non-believer wouldn't change his/her mind if presented factual evidence of a god's existence. Regardless, it doesn't change anything I said about the definition of agnostic and that, in my view, there are only believers and non-believers. 'Really just don't care' is not the definition of agnostic.
^Oh I completely disagree with you. Some (many?) atheists would be just as rabid about claiming a god doesn't exist even presented evidence that it did as many theists are in claiming god does exist given no proof. Whereas as an agnostic I really just don't care.
Well then, I disagree that you disagree! I don't think there is any reason to believe a rational non-believer wouldn't change his/her mind if presented factual evidence of a god's existence. Regardless, it doesn't change anything I said about the definition of agnostic and that, in my view, there are only believers and non-believers. 'Really just don't care' is not the definition of agnostic.
I guess using the strictest definition, you are correct. But atheism has become a near religion. Theists will argue the existence of their god of choice based on belief-based "proof" or historical documents. Atheists try to argue that no god can exist based on scientific theory and disproof of previous religious beliefs. While neither side cannot conclusively prove their claims, they will try their damnedest and argue over it incessantly.
Agnostics don't believe in a god, don't believe the existence of a god is out of the realm of possibility, and don't give a shit what you think about it.
"Agnostics don't believe in a god, don't believe the existence of a god is out of the realm of possibility," = the definition of atheist.
Some atheist have invented straw man deities to make fun of religious folks (see: Pastafarians). Large atheist groups (like American Atheists) try to evangelize the lack of god. Some atheists use the same tactics as religious people to get religious displays taken down from schools/government buildings. I know that atheism isn't a religion, I was just saying that people who self-identify as atheists ACT like they are a member of a religion whose deity is science.
"Agnostics don't believe in a god, don't believe the existence of a god is out of the realm of possibility," = the definition of atheist.
I disagree that "don't believe the existence of a god is out of the realm of possibility" is included in the definition of atheist. You asserting this repeatedly doesn't make it true. If the existence of a god was proven, then the "rational atheist" would just become religious. The agnostic would just point to the atheist and say "told you it was possible."
Enter your email address to join: