The insurance company is merely a provider. The flood stuff is done by your friendly local government, who has to provide that info to FEMA every year.
The flood zone issue is a bit more involved. A "Zone A" designation indicates that it is the likely extent of the 1% annual chance (fka 100-year) flood, but FEMA has not established a flood elevation, at least one accurate enough to hang their hats on. In contrast, areas where FEMA has determined the 1% floodplain through detailed study are designated "AE" with the base flood elevation indicated.
I'm less familiar with the legal mechanics of flood insurance, but it seems that when in doubt officials generally operate on the presumption that you're in the more stringent flood area unless you can demonstrate to the contrary. So if you're toeing the line of a Zone A, you actually need a civil engineer as well to estimate the flood flows and depths occurring in the area (by accepted engineering methods) to then compare to the elevations of the structure/property.
I've done 4 or 5 of these studies myself and my general takeaway has been that FEMA is quite conservative when drawing up Zone A limits, i.e. even employing the most generous assumptions (rainfall/runoff, streamflow, etc.) calculated flood elevations rarely get close to the extents shown on a FIRM. So yes, owner has to pay for survey and engineering, but it usually results in not having to pay for flood insurance year in/out.
Definitely helps, thanks! I do have a local civil engineer friend that might be able to work on this. There is a "LOMA" listed on the house a couple properties down, in the same Zone A--would this be of any use in making the flood elevation determination?So the property is along a tributary of what appears to be a major watercourse - it is helpful that the base elevations have been established along the latter through detailed study is beneficial, though how helpful... it really depends on what tools an engineer in your area has to work with. Assuming the tributary is ungauged, one would need to estimate peak flow at this point along the tributary by other methods - I'd first look at FEMA's Flood Insurance Study (these are the publicly available reports describing how the FEMA maps were developed) for the major watercourse to see what's published for catchment areas and computed flows (both upstream and downstream of the confluence), then to see if their are any relatively recent USGS regional regression models for estimating flows in ungauged catchments. After that there is the matter of evaluating the hydraulics of the watercourse, controls (e.g. culverts), etc. to determine the flood elevations associated with those peak flows, which can range from simple to very complex. If you already have a surveyor ask them if they have an engineer that they call upon for this sort of work, and see if they can give you a quote. HTH!
Enter your email address to join: