Here's a fun one to toss around. A judge has 6 years on the bench and is "retiring" due to a medical condition. Law says he needs to have 10 years in to get a full pension. He's using a clause in the laws designed to remove people from the bench that the legislature doesn't want as basis for justifying why he should a full pension of $97k/year starting now.
judge pension
FWIW, the law states that at 70 y.o. he would get a pension of ~$55k based on the 6 years he has in and he might be eligible to collect disability if they find he qualifies. Last year made ~$188k income from other sources besides his position as a judge.
Is this justice?
judge pension
FWIW, the law states that at 70 y.o. he would get a pension of ~$55k based on the 6 years he has in and he might be eligible to collect disability if they find he qualifies. Last year made ~$188k income from other sources besides his position as a judge.
Is this justice?