EB Mafia

[djl PE]

DAB!

 

[djl PE]

@DuranDuran PE Based purely on who didn't vote for @RBHeadge PE yesterday, I vote for @squaretaper LIT AF PE and @SaltySteve PE .

 

[SaltySteve PE]

@DuranDuran PE Based purely on who didn't vote for @RBHeadge PE yesterday, I vote for @squaretaper LIT AF PE and @SaltySteve PE .

At 8:57 yesterday I was running around my kitchen trying to find my phone to make sure I voted. I help out with a college scuba class every Thursday from 6-8:30 ish. I figured/hoped that @Dothracki PE would have been on the chopping block based on their voting history so I just repeated my previous vote.

2 scenarios;

A -There is 2 mafia and 3 townies. We need to get both mafia or we loose. (2 lynching + 1 Night kill leaves it 1T:1M)
B -There is 1 mafia and 4 townies. We need to get a mafia or we loose. (2 lynching + 1 Night kill leaves it 1T:1M)

My current reads:
Town lean - Bly
Mafia lean - DJL, (Square but he's often MIA and was last online Tuesday)
Mafia - Doth

@DuranDuran PE
Lynch 1 - @Dothracki PE
Lynch 2 - @djl PE (It looks sus that you've not voted all round and then you vote RBH last night to try to distance yourself from the maf)

 

[djl PE]

@town
I recommend not following @SaltySteve PE logic. Why, you may ask? because I am townie. It's very simple. Trust. No cap.

 

[djl PE]

BTW guys, I'm not clever. If I was maf I would not have initiated voting against presumably the only other know ally I had.

 

[RBHeadge PE]

Note: The town troublemaker stirred up trouble during the night, before she was nightkilled. Because of the trouble, there will be two lynchings today on Day 5.

Remaining Players are: @SaltySteve PE , @blybrook PE , @Dothracki PE , @djl PE and @squaretaper LIT AF PE

View attachment 23585

No matter who's side you're on or how you look at it:

 

[DLD PE]

Evil DLD reporting:

 

[DLD PE]

Looks like we have a 4-way tie so far.

In light of the troublemaker stirring up trouble, I'm implementing a new tie-breaker. Any tie-breakers tonight will be decided by RPLSS. See below for explanation:

 

[blybrook PE]

We're in the end game, that's for sure. The round really hinges on the townies banding together.

First, @DuranDuran PE votes #3 & 4 in your table are under the wrong row. @Dothracki PE didn't vote for himself. Needs to be moved up to @SaltySteve PE.

Now, onto the current situation...

I'm glad we finally got a MAF and the troublemaker was able to start trouble before being lost to the enemy. We don't know if @RBHeadge PE was the mafia spy or not as @DuranDuran PE only listed "regular mafia" under alliance. So the spy could still be out there. The doc hasn't been lynched, but their lackluster performance this round doesn't lead to any reads on who it is.

If I understand the rules correctly, all of the mafia have to agree on who to night kill. There isn't a majority rule (I could be wrong on this, it's been a while since I've played a round). If this is the case, whomever is mafia has been active on the board daily; albeit not in the round.

As mentioned in an earlier post, your status activity can still be hidden, so we really don't know if @squaretaper LIT AF PE has been on the board since the vote for @JayKay PE on Day 1 or not. We just know that there hasn't been any thread activity. Read - lean townie, potentially the doc

@Dothracki PE has regularly voted for a townie and has been somewhat active in the thread compared to others. The first vote was a random vote and there's been a post that they were confirmed townie by the dead cop. However, the ghost of @txjennah PE hasn't returned to verify this claim. Read -neutral

@SaltySteve PE has regularly voted for @Dothracki PE just to vote. Hasn't really been active otherwise compared to previous rounds. Could be carryover from a previous round. Read - Neutral

@djl PE didn't make a retaliatory vote when I voted for them on day 2; nor voted until yesterday to put out the first vote for @RBHeadge PE. Getting used to the game is one thing, but if you are in a round, be active. Read - Mafia Lean

@blybrook PE, well where should I start. I haven't played in a while and relied on the random name generator for the first few days as it was hard to get a read otherwise. The first 2 days didn't do the town any damage, but sure didn't help our cause on day 3. Read - Townie

I'm going to hold my votes until later today as things may come to light to change my current reads.

 

[DLD PE]

First, @DuranDuran PE votes #3 & 4 in your table are under the wrong row. @Dothracki PE didn't vote for himself. Needs to be moved up to @SaltySteve PE.

Thanks for this!

 

[Dothracki PE]

Looks like we have a 4-way tie so far.

In light of the troublemaker stirring up trouble, I'm implementing a new tie-breaker. Any tie-breakers tonight will be decided by RPLSS. See below for explanation:

View attachment 23587

If anyone needs more explanation

 

[DLD PE]

I'm glad we finally got a MAF and the troublemaker was able to start trouble before being lost to the enemy. We don't know if @RBHeadge PE was the mafia spy or not as @DuranDuran PE only listed "regular mafia" under alliance. So the spy could still be out there. The doc hasn't been lynched, but their lackluster performance this round doesn't lead to any reads on who it is.

@RBHeadge PE was a regular mafia. The mafia spy is still at large.

If I understand the rules correctly, all of the mafia have to agree on who to night kill. There isn't a majority rule (I could be wrong on this, it's been a while since I've played a round). If this is the case, whomever is mafia has been active on the board daily; albeit not in the round.

As the rules are currently written, the mafia night kill is majority rule. As I understand it, this is in place so if one of the mafia are too busy or distracted to vote, it won't prevent the mafia from a night kill. However, if there is a tie, there won't be a night kill. Since the mafia spy role was introduced, it motivates the rest of the mafia to vote together, since the spy is unknown to the mafia and may vote an potentially cause a tie. For this round (for game balance), I allowed the spy to be automatically united with the mafia after Day 3.

 

[DLD PE]

Corrected

 

[djl PE]

@djl PE didn't make a retaliatory vote when I voted for them on day 2; nor voted until yesterday to put out the first vote for @RBHeadge PE. Getting used to the game is one thing, but if you are in a round, be active. Read - Mafia Lean

You can get mad at me or not for not voting when I had no clue who was mafia and we were killing off townies left and right. I'm one for one killing mafs.
Plus I said no cap so there's no way I can be fibbing.

 

[blybrook PE]

Plus I said no cap so there's no way I can be fibbing.

I've never heard of this term. Had to go look it up. Thanks for the information.

 

[SaltySteve PE]

I assumed that you mean "no crap".

For anyone else that is old here is the Urban Dictionary definition.

No cap
The use of the phrase "no cap" is meant to convey authenticity and truth. The phrase originated in reference to decorative gold teeth, which can be divided into two distinct varieties: permanent gold teeth (aka "perms") or caps (aka "pullouts"). Whereas caps can be pulled out with ease, perms, as their name suggests, are permanent. They cannot be taken out for a job interview or court date. They are an honest and lasting expression of the owners' realness.
I would only get perms because people who wear pullouts are fake, no cap.
by daybird August 27, 2020

 

[BlueBlueprintPE PMP]

BTW guys, I'm not clever. If I was maf I would not have initiated voting against presumably the only other know ally I had.

eh ... it's definitely been known to happen. Especially when the game is nearing an end and the MAF wants to try to sway townie votes.

I've never heard of this term. Had to go look it up. Thanks for the information.

I also had to look it up...

My read:

Lean Townie: Bly, Square (possibly the doc? since they seem to have been MIA this round, as has the doc)
Neutral: Salty
Lean MAF: DJL, Doth

Doth, purportedly cleared by the COP on day one, could be the MAFIA spy.... in which case, everything that Doth said in their "Confirmed Townie" post would be correct, but irrelevant if they are the spy.

Of course, I could be totally off-base.

 

[DLD PE]

Day 5:

CC5:

@DJL walked into the control room with @blybrook PE , having been on patrol and sniffing out any burrowed Zerg or Nydus canal entrances. He found @tj_PE relaxed in her chair, painting her nails and listening to music while eating some food. "What in the world is that?", asked @djl PE . @tj_PE pulled the plate away before a sniffing @blybrook PE had a chance to grab it. "I call it 'The Rise of Canis', after one of our moons. I think I might enjoy one good meal before we all become infested."



@djl PE confided in @squaretaper LIT AF PE . "That adjutant droid thing you built is losing it. Not only is she starting to eat like humans, she's naming her food for chrissakes! She must be having a nervous breakdown." @squaretaper LIT AF PE said, "These adjuatants are built with very complex computer systems. They are almost like humans, but they don't know how to handle certain emotions, like the possibility of their own destruction. I don't have the heart to unplug her yet. Besides, her next battle plan could mean the difference between our success and annihilation. "

Zerg Hive:

"We're now a HIVE!", cackled the hydralisk.

"I KNOW that!", retorted Daggoth

"We can create ultralisks now!!"

"I KNOW that!"

"We don't even have to fight the Terrans....we can just step...."

Daggoth backhanded the hydralisk, slamming it against the spire.

"For someone who makes so much noise, you don't say anything useful!", Daggoth grumbled.

The Zerg focused on producing as many new zerglings as possible with enhanced carapace and adrenal glands, and also to produce a few ultralisks.

 

[DLD PE]

Day lynch and night kill will happen tonight. We will break for the weekend as usual, and results/story will be revealed Monday morning.

 

[SaltySteve PE]

https://starcraft.com/en-us/
for anyone interested, the original starcraft is free....