Fluvial
The Ditch Witch
Nice ****ys, Dleg.
Oh, and great post too.
Oh, and great post too.
It's the national bird of Hong Kong.Who doesn't like tower cranes?
I have to remember that one.It's the national bird of Hong Kong.
Actually, I screwed that up. They don't use tower cranes in Hong Kong. They use bamboo scaffolding. It's crazy to see that stuff built up to over 100 stories.I have to remember that one.
Me too!I like this thread.
I knew a woman engineer who went to that work environment in Texas in the early 80's. She was asian (rare) and a woman (unheard of) and found the good ol' boys appreciated originals and mavericks and just gave her her own category in their own minds....she did great and had lots of fun. If she had ever crossed paths with your former coworker, they might have compared notes....to your coworker's benefit..... in the oil field, and almost immediately after finishing the 6-month training period, I was given a brand-new female engineer to train. She was a tough girl and wanted to show everyone how tough she was. There were very, very few women in the oil field at that time (1991 - and probably hasn't changed)....and she ended up kind of insulting the crew by taking away some of their work, and then also occasionally messing up the engineer's job by spending too much time on the stuff the crew could have been doing, and neglecting the stuff the engineer needed to be doing. So, IMO, she ended up hurting herself by trying too hard.
I think largely you get what you expect...but on the other hand, a lack of other women (or short stays) is usually a bad sign. Being too sensitive loses you the discretionary information and friendly tips that adds up to something significant. Someone I work with now goes in for the kill and reports to the boss whenever someone slips up a little (sticking up for herself!)....and as a result, many people choose not to give her "heads up" or extra info and she feels like "people just don't like me".....If she'd just chill a little I think she'd enjoy work much more.I think the A&E office is a far worse place than the oil field when it comes to the treatment of women.
I caused a stink a few years ago when I attended a student professional society meeting and later followed up with their faculty advisor. I let the advisor know that I found I was behaving differently toward the women that attended and were dressed either in revealing (in-style show the belly) clothing or looked like they were going to a party, with cleavage or clubbing clothes. I discounted them and didn't make any effort to connect professionally--treated them as if they were there for the food or to be dates, not to network. I realized how I'd behaved later and asked around to see if my reaction was unique - and it wasn't. After the event, I attempted to point out through their advisor that they should know what reaction they were sending to people who were no longer college students and to consider if they were OK with that. (I didn't tell them how to dress....) What really struck me was that all the males hit the exact right note and conveyed they were serious about careers by what they choose to wear. I didn't want the females to miss out just cause they didn't know any better.I don't sense any "gender issues" at all, except for the occasional young, freshly-graduated environmental professional. I've run into a few of them that seem like they're tryingt o hard to impress, but that goes for both genders, to be honest.
Good going!But I do try. (and I married a co-worker - so my workplace flirting succeeded at least once)
So you're saying I shouldn't wear my bike shorts to IEEE meetings anymore?I caused a stink a few years ago when I attended a student professional society meeting and later followed up with their faculty advisor. I let the advisor know that I found I was behaving differently toward the women that attended and were dressed either in revealing (in-style show the belly) clothing or looked like they were going to a party, with cleavage or clubbing clothes. I discounted them and didn't make any effort to connect professionally--treated them as if they were there for the food or to be dates, not to network. I realized how I'd behaved later and asked around to see if my reaction was unique - and it wasn't. After the event, I attempted to point out through their advisor that they should know what reaction they were sending to people who were no longer college students and to consider if they were OK with that. (I didn't tell them how to dress....) What really struck me was that all the males hit the exact right note and conveyed they were serious about careers by what they choose to wear. I didn't want the females to miss out just cause they didn't know any better.
Hmmm ... I am wondering about the rating.Who doesn't like tower cranes?
More resigned to my fate than anything else.
Chucktown - could you talk to my husband??
However, I disagree with the notion that a woman has to come out and say exactly what they/we want. Doing things unexpectedly and without being asked makes you seem considerate and caring to her needs (back rubs, romantic dinners, bubble baths, etc), so she's more likely to be considerate and caring to your needs (***). If we had to tell you to do those things to make us happy, then it makes it look like all you care about is your needs (***). When you tell a woman that your needs aren't being met, yes we feel bad, but our needs still aren't being met and it makes it look like all you care about is you.You know that brings up another point, I think a lot of these issues get swept under the rug and I'm not sure why. The woman often keeps these feeling to herself when if she'd just say, "It would really make me feel good if you did ......" instead of hoping by chance that the man will jump through hoops x, a, c, y, r, t, and o in that particular order (which almost never happens).
I finally got frustrated enough where I made my wife tell me, and even then she gave me a couple of clues and insights in to what was going on. Even then, most of it I had to figure out on my own.
Chuck / klk - you're right that doing nice/caring things for one another (and it goes both ways) is important in keeping the fire going, but I'm a guy - I'm going to tell you what I think... no beatin' around the bush (so to speak). I'm sure if you read my earlier post, you can tell that this is a sore subject. Every individual is complex and everyone has their own history which feeds into thoughts and feelings about how a relationship should be handled.Lets treat it like a points system, and while you might get 1 point for doing something when specifically asked, you get bonus points (lets say 3 points) for doing them without specifically being asked to do it, but she had to drop several hints to get you to see she wanted it. Then, you get super duper bonus points when you do something for her when it's least expected and a total surpise. Then, lets say it takes a certain number of points to get the woman to have *** (the number of points required depends on the woman, her mood, her self image, etc which can be positively/negatively changed depending on the man's actions). Once you have ***, the points drop down to zero and you start over. The more often you perform random acts of kindness towards your wife, the more often she will want to reciprocate.
I fully admit I think its irrational for us to expect you to read our minds and know what we want, but we can't help it if its the way we feel (for most women, *** is directly tied to feelings). On the other hand, it seems like guys knew what to do when dating a girl to get them into bed (I'll call it "courting"), but those actions stop once you say "I do" because the husband thinks that he "deserves" *** anytime since he's now married. Funny how the *** stops once the courting stops . . .
Although I've known some people who actually *do* seem to keep track of 'points', the way I read klk's post, she was just using it as an example. Perhaps a better way to put it would be a 'good will' bank, 'cause what each partner is doing (when they are being considerate and supporting each other) is creating a warm fuzzy feeling in the other one. Those good feelings, if kept alive by frequent positive interactions, build up into a 'good will' bank. That keeps each partner looking at the other in a positive light; keeps the woman feeling 'wanted' and keeps her wanting to be 'close' to her husband; and therefore is conducive to a good *** life.I understand klk where you're coming from... but, knowing that someone is "keeping score", ie. points, is pretty rediculous. If *** has anything to do with feelings like you say most women feel (and I happen to think it's a more emotional experience than my wife), then there wouldn't be an "if you do this... then you get that". I consider that just as one sided and selfish as a person who's "just in it for the ***" - a person who's "just in it only if they get x,y,and z and keeping score in their head.
If you're in a loving and caring relationship all that good stuff that makes a marriage work (doing nice and caring things for each other) should come naturally, but with effort (believe me I understand there is effort required). Agreed, ruts can occur, but give me a break - points system. I think your points description is an oversimplification of a very complex relationship that for each couple is a little different. Points. That kind of pisses me off. The purpose of a trusting and loving relationship is to have the ability to not keep score, and love each other despite your faults.
Maybe it was just a bad example of describing how important that being thoughtful to your spouse is...
Enter your email address to join: