bassplayer45
Well-known member
So this is my 4th time around (lateral). I felt okay about the morning. My first time through, i think i confidently answered 27-29 questions. Then made some very strong guesses on maybe 3-4 more. I only straight circle guessed 2 questions. I know i will be protesting / putting in note about 2 problems in the morning that were worded horrible, you really could have gone 2 ways and both answers were on there. I was REALLY caught off guard by some ACI reference questions that straight up had me say "huh?" I do concrete every day and hadn't seen any of those scenarios they asked for
As far as the bridge afternoon, not too many surprises. I finished about 45 minutes early, but i do essays pretty quick. First question i thought it was kind of straight forward, but was asking for a TON of info and analysis that required alot of code check sections. The second question, nice little tricky question that was not so straight forward, but ALOT of work to answer everything they were asking for in the technical 1 hour it took. For the third question, there was one part i got caught off guard by, but i think i sorted through it. I got reasonable answers and i hope i get credit for the proper method, which i thought i had.
I feel good *knock on wood*, but again, it may come down the grader and what they consider the "cut off" for multiple choice. My entire drive back to indy was me going through every problem in my head thinking about every little thing i may have missed or misinterpreted. I already know i made a goof on my statics for the 3rd problem on the last part and i kind of wish i would have gone back through my work a 3rd time, but my method was there and mistakes happen.
Now the waiting begins. At least i got a big steak and a bottle of wine with my bro after it was over. I know i got that right
As far as the bridge afternoon, not too many surprises. I finished about 45 minutes early, but i do essays pretty quick. First question i thought it was kind of straight forward, but was asking for a TON of info and analysis that required alot of code check sections. The second question, nice little tricky question that was not so straight forward, but ALOT of work to answer everything they were asking for in the technical 1 hour it took. For the third question, there was one part i got caught off guard by, but i think i sorted through it. I got reasonable answers and i hope i get credit for the proper method, which i thought i had.
I feel good *knock on wood*, but again, it may come down the grader and what they consider the "cut off" for multiple choice. My entire drive back to indy was me going through every problem in my head thinking about every little thing i may have missed or misinterpreted. I already know i made a goof on my statics for the 3rd problem on the last part and i kind of wish i would have gone back through my work a 3rd time, but my method was there and mistakes happen.
Now the waiting begins. At least i got a big steak and a bottle of wine with my bro after it was over. I know i got that right