R
rppearso
Yes I agree that if you start onto the work it should be to the best of your ability and "stamp worthy" however I would simply not start on the project without a compensation negotiation prior and if the compensation was not to my liking I simply would nto start the project and there is nothing unethical about that.I would wholeheartedly terminate you for that before you could even start with any BS excuse of why you're not ready to stamp your work.I have never seen anywhere in the statues that requires you to stamp drawings that you worked on (just because I work on a drawing does not mean im ready to stamp it when a project manager says so, I may need time which = a huge fatty raise before the drawings can go forward or someone else can stamp them), I worked on all kinds of drawings as an EIT and obvously I never stamped them.
As a EIT, yes you did plans, specs, etc... then passed it on to your PE to stamp and take responsibility for those stamped plans, specs, etc... When you passed on your work as an EIT you were passing on work that had been completed to your best ability and to your knowledge, was stamp worthy.
Now your a PE and can stamp your work. Are you now telling me that the work you do now is not stamp worthy, or you don't know what stamp worthy is, or that it's not your best effort, any excuse that you pull from your bag of tricks can be considered as a regression in your ability to do your job as per your work description (even if your description says nothing about you stampnig your own work), and a regression in your ability to do your work per your job description is legal grounds for termination in any state, unless of course the regression is due to being legally impaired/disabled... which now that I think about it all the PEs I've worked with could be considered legally retarded so I guess you can't get fired.