FLBuff PE
Multi-disciplinary engineer
Sounds similar to what happened to Ma Bell. Just for a different reason. I don't disagree with you, Cappy.Maybe corporations that are 'too big to fail' should be broken up...
Sounds similar to what happened to Ma Bell. Just for a different reason. I don't disagree with you, Cappy.Maybe corporations that are 'too big to fail' should be broken up...
True to a fault. The "old way" was to take care of dedicated employees who had provided years of service to the mothership. this system (just like social security) works as long as your generating enough revenue to sustain it. Times change. Through the miracles of modern medicine, people are living longer and newer (more expensive) treatments are available. This translates to providing more benefits for a longer period of time. This evolution was parallel to advancements in manufacturing techniques so the work was easier and less people were needed. Unions fought at both ends; we can't get rid of people and we can't reduce benefits. The company's policies (just like the government's) didn't change with the times.I think a similar paradigm is what caused GM's downfall. They stopped being a corporation that built cars and started being a health care/retirement program that used car sales to fund the system.
My fleecing comment was directed to your blanket statement that the primary function of a business is to make money. If you get away with it, fleecing people makes a lot of money. As far as GM is concerned, they could be accused of "fleecing" people during the late 70's and early 80's where the quality of the product deteriorated and the prices skyrocketed. It was this period where the American buying public lost faith in the Amercan manufacturers and started touting the benefits of Toyota and Honda. American market share plummeted and they never got it back.How was GM fleecing anybody? With the contracts that the UAW was getting, I'd say it was the other way around. Don't you think the union has at least some culpability in not having as many jobs as they had. And how much money should they get paid for operating a wrench, which I'm sure any one of us can do.
Then another thing that probably needs to be discussed is prolonging the time before retirement.Through the miracles of modern medicine, people are living longer and newer (more expensive) treatments are available. This translates to providing more benefits for a longer period of time.
Yep. All I've got thus far aside from traditional savings is a 401k that continues to lose money.I think the generation of workers just out of school will be lucky to get any retirement at all.
I'll be lucky if I get it and I'm 43.I think the generation of workers just out of school will be lucky to get any retirement at all.
I hear you. I've lost 50% of my retirement savings twice in the last ten years.Yep. All I've got thus far aside from traditional savings is a 401k that continues to lose money.
Read this rather interesting article on why GM failed.
The thing about business is, if you don't keep up with technology & trends, then the market will run off and leave you.
I also agree about the number of dealers. There are too many here.
That's what is being reported.I heard a news report of talks about selling Hummer to a Chinese company.
Not today but in the future. With federal mismanagement and interference GM and Chrysler will probably be suited only to produce vehicles for the consumption of the federal government leaving Toyota and Honda free to produce for-profit vehicles.Toyota and Honda had pretty bad May sales..38 and 39% drop respectively.
It ain't just GM and Chrysler.
Oh, I see. Concur.Not today but in the future. With federal mismanagement and interference GM and Chrysler will probably be suited only to produce vehicles for the consumption of the federal government leaving Toyota and Honda free to produce for-profit vehicles.
and we know the gubberment ain't "car guys" or at least they can't admit it.Not today but in the future. With federal mismanagement and interference GM and Chrysler will probably be suited only to produce vehicles for the consumption of the federal government leaving Toyota and Honda free to produce for-profit vehicles.
That's the way Europe does it...must be better.I've worked on government projects and now appreciate where $600 hammers come from.
$80K Cobalt/Malibu anyone?
I heard a quip from Michael Moore that the feds should confiscate GM's factories to make buses and trains. :ghey:
Unfortunately for us car enthusiasts, 95% of the populace sees their car as an appliance to get from one place to another in comfort.They must restrict themselves to functional, efficient transportation. i.e. NO FUN STUFF!
I heard a quip from Michael Moore that the feds should confiscate GM's factories to make buses and trains. :ghey:
Well played, sir! Well played!That's the way Europe does it...must be better.