EB Mafia
- Thread starter ChebyshevII PE PMP
- Start date
Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
- Messages
- 9,037
- Reaction score
- 5,050
SaltySteve PE
Voted most likely to be Mafia
SaltySteve PE
Voted most likely to be Mafia
time
Will.I.Am PE
Well-known member
Last edited by a moderator:
SaltySteve PE
Voted most likely to be Mafia
Done.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
- Messages
- 9,037
- Reaction score
- 5,050
SaltySteve PE
Voted most likely to be Mafia
Will.I.Am PE
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
- Messages
- 9,037
- Reaction score
- 5,050
SaltySteve PE
Voted most likely to be Mafia
SaltySteve PE
Voted most likely to be Mafia
LyceeFruit PE
Woodchipped Voice of Reason
- Joined
- May 25, 2018
- Messages
- 5,926
- Reaction score
- 3,121
A second week has passed since the exam. The Spam thread is now at 3,593 posts long; it's still mostly vets but a few no0bz have joined in on the fun. Meanwhile the WTTS thread is on page eight and the nubz are starting to show signs of Phase 2 (second guessing).
It was a pretty boring week on the board. The most excitement came when @Will.I.Am PE started taking bets on the release date. An interesting new take on "Guessing the release date". He used a fancy algorithm (read: asking @RBHeadge PE) to determine the over/under, and collected bets from two dozen examinees. Things were gong great until @_TheDude_ felt that it was inappropriate to engage in such activity and he notified Nieces. They replied that it wasn't against the candidate agreement but demanded a sacrifice for wasting their time.
The examinees had a vote. And it was split 50/50. But Neices had to be satisfied, so a moderator told them to rock paper scissors to determine the winner.
@Will.I.Am PE
@_TheDude_
Neices nullified @_TheDude_'s results. He was a regular examinee and the vigilante.
It was a pretty boring week on the board. The most excitement came when @Will.I.Am PE started taking bets on the release date. An interesting new take on "Guessing the release date". He used a fancy algorithm (read: asking @RBHeadge PE) to determine the over/under, and collected bets from two dozen examinees. Things were gong great until @_TheDude_ felt that it was inappropriate to engage in such activity and he notified Nieces. They replied that it wasn't against the candidate agreement but demanded a sacrifice for wasting their time.
The examinees had a vote. And it was split 50/50. But Neices had to be satisfied, so a moderator told them to rock paper scissors to determine the winner.
@Will.I.Am PE
@_TheDude_
Neices nullified @_TheDude_'s results. He was a regular examinee and the vigilante.
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry 
