I know at least one nuclear plant in WI was offering right at six figures for Systems Engineers last year. With new construction coming, the demand is pretty high for people with nuclear experience right now.I know a lot of people with 10 years experience in *gasp* civil that make 6 figures and dont have to work in the oil fields
+1I know at least one nuclear plant in WI was offering right at six figures for Systems Engineers last year. With new construction coming, the demand is pretty high for people with nuclear experience right now.
I can't tell if you're implying that I'm lacking in the initiative department or not. I'll assume you're not. I work a solid 50 to 60 hours every week and I have other sources of income (stock market and used boat sales) that makes me some more money on the side. I know plenty of people in my company that are making $100k but let's be honest, that's just not that much money any more. I just think that in general, you're not going to get rich in this profession. Even if you do open your own shop, the chances of you ever making good money are slim.It takes a little bit of initiative but their are plenty of engineers who make well into 6 figures. working for county government wont get you there, nor will working for most structural AE (building structural is a low-paying gig contrary to popular belief)
6 figures is not at all uncommon for a PE in industry.
maybe you fit this profile?
http://jobview.monster.com/GetJob.aspx?Job...amp;from=indeed
200-250k / yr
and yes - I make 6 figures.
Hey guys I was wondering what you guys think of a BS in engineering, with a law degree. There are many lawyers out there but almost none with technical backgrounds. I know a PE professional witness that testifies in court, and he tells me a lawyer with an engineering degree with clean up. He says that most of the lawyers dont know jack squat and if you have basic engineering knowledge most lawyers cant even touch you in some cases.
Just want to know what you guys think.
Also wondering about Engineering BS, MBA, JD combination?? Would qualify you on business and engineering grounds in court.
I'm not implying that at all. I recently moved from a place were engineers are not highly paid to an area were, by and large, they are. It was a life change and we left a rather leisurly environment of beaches, family and friends to a big dirty city with long work hours. It was not an easy decision and one I still think about.I can't tell if you're implying that I'm lacking in the initiative department or not. I'll assume you're not. I work a solid 50 to 60 hours every week and I have other sources of income (stock market and used boat sales) that makes me some more money on the side. I know plenty of people in my company that are making $100k but let's be honest, that's just not that much money any more. I just think that in general, you're not going to get rich in this profession. Even if you do open your own shop, the chances of you ever making good money are slim.
These days, I don't even think it is wise to go into med school if your reason is to earn more money. I make almost as much as my GP doc. And with the new healthcare proposals, who knows what is going to happen to doctor's pay. To make a lot you have to be a specialist, and that takes even more time.I really regret not going to medical school. I often think about taking a couple of classes and taking the MCAT to see what happens. But I have two kids and a wife that doesn't work and spending the next 10 years in school/residency/fellowship will mean that I'll miss thier childhood.
I'm curious, Chucktown - what it about medicine that grabs you that you're not finding in your current job? Is there a way to add some of that to the mix, perhaps by changing jobs, but not career?To clarify, I didn't mean I wanted to go to medical school just to become a doctor. I think it would be more rewarding than what I'm doing now and I would have enjoyed it more. Or course the grass is always greener on the other side.
I'd also considered med school a couple times - once for as long as thirty seconds. It doesn't take long to remember how bad I was at chemistry and that's the end of that daydream.I really regret not going to medical school. I often think about taking a couple of classes and taking the MCAT to see what happens. But I have two kids and a wife that doesn't work and spending the next 10 years in school/residency/fellowship will mean that I'll miss thier childhood.
It's a bimodal distribution. Coming out of law school, new associates cluster around $60k or $160k, with almost nobody in the middle. Top students from top schools get $160k, and the best of the rest settle for the $60k jobs. Everyone else goes their own separate ways. Most move back in with their parents. However, they usually have undergraduate degrees in English or Political Science... :suicide1:One of my coworkers graduated from a Big Ten law school in 2006 but stayed here until last month. He got a couple offers after graduation but they were significant pay cuts. I think he still took a smaller pay cut when he left here but I'm not sure.
FYI: My coworker was making $60k here as a planner (not an engineer). Sounds like most of his new clients are land developers who are trying to force their developments into municipalities that don't want them (going for variances, filing appeals, etc)It's a bimodal distribution. Coming out of law school, new associates cluster around $60k or $160k, with almost nobody in the middle. Top students from top schools get $160k, and the best of the rest settle for the $60k jobs. Everyone else goes their own separate ways. Most move back in with their parents.
A handful of friends of mine (and a co-worker) were engineers and later obtained JDs. The ones that made the switch into Law struggled early on from the ego blow of being considered 'junior' status. Most of them didn't go the litigation route, but rather work in codes, environmental regulatory law, etc. Then they seemed to do well, but I still like to call them lawyer scum to their faces!I've known a few lawyers who were engineers for several years (and one guy who was a city manager). Frankly, they seem to get less respect from some of the "regular" lawyers, but mostly because they are considered "junior" lawyers because they started so late.
I've also known at least a half dozen lawyers who never hesitated to make engineering decisions, despite having no training as engineers.
I guess what I am saying is this: Lawyers are arrogant scum, as a rule. Don't become a lawyer unless you want to become a lawyer.
To add on to the supply and demand argument, I just became aware that the NCEES will be requiring a master's degree, PhD, or 30 additional credits in order to sit for the PE exam starting either 2015 or 2020 (I have seen two different reports) along with the experience requirement. That is only going to make the license more valuble in the future.Since I'm a patent attorney with a PE, I'll add to the responses here. The answer to the question is like the answer to every other question in law: it depends!
First, there are too many lawyers. 40,000 graduates are taking the bar this week, and in a few months, at least 30,000 of them will become admitted attorneys. Few will have found employment by then, at least not in the legal field. Still, the benevolent USPTO limits the number of patent attorneys out there. Any lawyer can claim to be a "tax lawyer" or "criminal lawyer," but you must be registered with the PTO to call yourself a "patent lawyer." It's a recognized specialty. So fortunately, there is far less competition for the patent law jobs that do exist.
Still, as a civil engineer, the road to a solid position in patent law with a large firm or prestigious patent boutique is very uphill. Patent prosecution is hot right now in electrical, computer, and biotech, and lukewarm in mechanical. Civil engineering just does not represent the bleeding edge of technological development. Also, the PE license is pretty insignificant in the legal world (unless you're a expert witness).
As for money, large law firms pay well. $145-160k is the norm right now. However, keep in mind that those firms pay a ton because they have to, otherwise nobody would work there. The work-life balance is, well, nonexistent. There are late nights and long weekends, and many projects assigned to young associates are mind-numbing. To bill 2000 hours, you might end up working 2500 in a year. That's a lot of time in the office, or worse, on the road. People deal with it because they are six figures in student loan debt (which cannot be discharged in bankruptcy).
You might end up liking law better than engineering. I did, but it's not for everyone.
The additional value will come by less people getting their PE due to not being able to obtain the education requirement. Therefore, less PEs will equal more money to the ones that have it. Theoretically...^ it will certainly make it more costly. . .but i do not believe any additional value can be claimed (or will be paid out across the industry by employers) from the more robust requirements.
It's a double edge sword. Too few P.E.'s out there could have the opposite effect.The additional value will come by less people getting their PE due to not being able to obtain the education requirement. Therefore, less PEs will equal more money to the ones that have it. Theoretically...
Enter your email address to join: