Vertical vs. Lateral or Other

Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum

Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Which topic do you find more challenging and will find it helpful if someone (me) tries to explain i


  • Total voters
    19

Andy Lin

Founder of Structural Engineer HQ
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
89
Reaction score
12
Location
San Diego, California
Testing out the poll system on this forum.

Also a legitimate question: which one do you find more challenging while studying for the SE - Vertical or Lateral?

 
Lateral, but not because of the material, but because of experience.

In real life practice, I've never designed a building in SDC D-F, mostly SDC A-B.

This lack of experience and practice makes SE lateral more difficult.

 
Vertical, due to the depth of material while studying. I passed Lateral first try, but am waiting on results for Vertical, second attempt. I think I found lateral easier because all of the material is contained within fewer code/references.

However, I took both exams at the same time October, 2013, and felt that they were both equally difficult in their own way.

 
Also, I'm a buildings guy, not bridges. I can't speak for the differences in Bridge exams.

 
Eastern USA and bridge design. 3rd attempt at lateral bridges.

Vertical morning - Similar difficulty to PE-Civil Structures PM - medium difficulty

Vertical bridge essay - Light to medium difficulty - passed on 1st try

Lateral morning - very hard, problems look simple but lot of trick questions (so far did not get a chance to finish all in time)

Lateral bridge essays - medium difficulty

I know it is tough for bridge guys, but we get to learn/study/explore more than building test takers :)

 
Thanks for the input guys :)

It seems like more people find lateral portion challenging (8 vs 4 as of this writing) so I am going to give it a shot and write a few things for SDC C-F and see if I can be helpful.

pwilliams: I hope you pass! What was your main weakness if you don't mind me asking?

str_academy: I am a building guy also; sorry I probably won't be able to help much with bridges in terms of technical info. Out of curiosity though, what are the benefits of having a SE if your work mainly involves bridge design. I am just wondering because most of the bridge engineers that I know in CA don't have their SEs.

 
str_academy: I am a building guy also; sorry I probably won't be able to help much with bridges in terms of technical info. Out of curiosity though, what are the benefits of having a SE if your work mainly involves bridge design. I am just wondering because most of the bridge engineers that I know in CA don't have their SEs.
Certain states require an SE for bridges over 200-ft long (or other specified length).

 
str_academy: I am a building guy also; sorry I probably won't be able to help much with bridges in terms of technical info. Out of curiosity though, what are the benefits of having a SE if your work mainly involves bridge design. I am just wondering because most of the bridge engineers that I know in CA don't have their SEs.
Certain states require an SE for bridges over 200-ft long (or other specified length).
Or maybe it's just Washington...

 
str_academy: I am a building guy also; sorry I probably won't be able to help much with bridges in terms of technical info. Out of curiosity though, what are the benefits of having a SE if your work mainly involves bridge design. I am just wondering because most of the bridge engineers that I know in CA don't have their SEs.
Certain states require an SE for bridges over 200-ft long (or other specified length).
That makes sense... thanks.

 
pwilliams: I hope you pass! What was your main weakness if you don't mind me asking?
Thanks! Probably masonry design at the time of taking it the first time. Wood is a distant second to that, however, what we were tested on was a specific weakness within wood design. There were a couple of tricky questions in the afternoon that tripped me up, which I knew after taking it and confirmed by my diagnostic. I didn't find problems that those this go round so we'll see how it goes.

This time around I studied masonry a lot more and continued what I was doing on the other subjects. Felt comfortable after the exam, so hopefully I did what I needed to do to pass.

 

Latest posts

Back
Top