Seismic Exam is Pointless for Non-Structural Engineers

Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum

Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

BananaMan11

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2025
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Location
Dallas, TX
I just need to vent about the frustration of having to learn all the seismic material for the exam. Unless you're a structural engineer, you’ll likely never need to know anything about seismic design, so it feels completely pointless that the board continues to make this a licensure requirement in California. It makes no sense for non-structural engineers to have to learn this, especially when most general civil engineers aren’t designing structures in their day-to-day work. I honestly don’t understand what benefit the board sees in keeping this requirement—it just seems unnecessary. Naturally, structural engineers have a strong foundation in this area, so it’s much easier for them to pass the exam compared to non-structural engineers. I can’t be the only one who feels this way… or maybe I am.
 
I just need to vent about the frustration of having to learn all the seismic material for the exam. Unless you're a structural engineer, you’ll likely never need to know anything about seismic design, so it feels completely pointless that the board continues to make this a licensure requirement in California. It makes no sense for non-structural engineers to have to learn this, especially when most general civil engineers aren’t designing structures in their day-to-day work. I honestly don’t understand what benefit the board sees in keeping this requirement—it just seems unnecessary. Naturally, structural engineers have a strong foundation in this area, so it’s much easier for them to pass the exam compared to non-structural engineers. I can’t be the only one who feels this way… or maybe I am.
I’m with you on this! Third times the charm for me and this seismic exam :(
 
I totally agree. no other state in the country mandates additional seismic and surveying exams for civil engineers. This creates an unnecessary burden on California engineers
 
The only reason they haven’t removed it is because the board has a “well, I did it, so you should too” mentality - and because it lets them collect more money. The only way I see the geriatric board dropping this requirement is if enough people petition for it. Until then, they’ll keep stymieing the number of licensed engineers for no justifiable reason.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top