http://www.schoolofpe.com/pestructural/passrates.asp
This is pretty impressive considering it was the first time out of the gate. I am taking the Kaplan review course currently on archive and will b able to review the January live webinar. Has anyone received any word if Kaplan has a similar ad for their pass rates? All I can say so far is that the lateral forces concrete review is not good. The vertical review is done by the president of PCA, which is outstanding. Tim Mays is very good in all his seminars and Rafael Sabelli is very well respected for steel, but his vertical review is only like 1.5 hours and his lateral review is a mere 1 hour. I feel that the steel review is pretty poor - not because of Sabelli per se, but because he's not given enough time it appears.
The structural analysis is done by a young PhD lady, and she's not bad. Susan Frey does the masonry and the exam strategy and she's very respected for Oregon State, contributes to writing the exam, and is a very good teacher.
All-in-all, the review course gives me that extra boost of confidence that I know more than I first thought and that I can tackle all 16 hours with a better understanding of what the graders are looking for in the afternoon.
If anyone has a thought on the school of PE, I'd like to hear it. Thanks.
This is pretty impressive considering it was the first time out of the gate. I am taking the Kaplan review course currently on archive and will b able to review the January live webinar. Has anyone received any word if Kaplan has a similar ad for their pass rates? All I can say so far is that the lateral forces concrete review is not good. The vertical review is done by the president of PCA, which is outstanding. Tim Mays is very good in all his seminars and Rafael Sabelli is very well respected for steel, but his vertical review is only like 1.5 hours and his lateral review is a mere 1 hour. I feel that the steel review is pretty poor - not because of Sabelli per se, but because he's not given enough time it appears.
The structural analysis is done by a young PhD lady, and she's not bad. Susan Frey does the masonry and the exam strategy and she's very respected for Oregon State, contributes to writing the exam, and is a very good teacher.
All-in-all, the review course gives me that extra boost of confidence that I know more than I first thought and that I can tackle all 16 hours with a better understanding of what the graders are looking for in the afternoon.
If anyone has a thought on the school of PE, I'd like to hear it. Thanks.