palvarez83
Project Engineer
Agreed, most EE programs do not have an emphasis on power, especially if your university is a "research institution" where they focus on on the high tech stuff. I was a ME major so when doing the EE PE, I bought the following textbook:As somebody who has graduated from college with decent grades, passed the FE the first time and has now failed the test twice (with scores not very close to passing), I find this comment insulting.Fellow Engineers-- Remember, the PE test is designed to find the "Minimally Competent" engineer. This is the D level student. The test is written to make sure that the D level student can pass this examination. After all, the D student is barely passing.
Now, the minimally competent engineer has to have, at least, a basic understanding of the core test areas. After all, you probably passed an ABET accredited program at your college or university
</rant> The problem with the exam is that is that it is almost completely irrelevant to my job (despite it being requred to advance to higher levels in it). My major was EE. Our school didn't even have a Power concentration if I wanted to take classes in it (not many do). Now that I work at an MEP firm, I still don't need to know the inner workings of transformers or generators. </rant>
I find it amusing multiple people are recommending all this extra studying of the NEC when it is only a maximum of 10 questions on the test and this person already got 6 of them correct. It's one of the subjects he did best in.
http://www.amazon.com/Systems-Analysis-Design-Duncan-Glover/dp/0534548849/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1325655348&sr=8-3
It is the textbook used by universities with "practical curricula". This was my first source. Each chapter has plenty of practice problems. I downloaded the solutions manual (if you interested). After reading chapters 2, 3, &4 and working problems from the book, I was able to answer the majority of the questions on the practice exam that were not code related.
I would skip ch 5, but if you have time read 6-11 (some of these chapters are more practical than others). The book is well indexed, so even during the exam I was able to look up stuff that I had no clue about. The book might be a bit overkill, which is why I recommend skipping lots of stuff especially the heavy math things.
Then I read the PPI EERM. In my opinion, it does not have enough details, but still a great reference. If you combine these two references, it should be adequate. Let me know if you'd like additional study tips.