I would put my AM/PM numbers about the same as yours. AM I had around 25 or more that I thought I for sure knew how to do and ran out of time on the rest. PM portion I was confident in closer to 35. I also expected them to be the other way around.I think this thread needs further explanation.
For example,
AM portion was harder for somebody who did really well on the PM portion (30+ correct) is NOT the same with AM portion was easier for somebody who did 25+ on the AM and 17+ on the PM.
Make sense?
My assumptions for my exam: 25+ AM and 35+ PM (So, AM was VERY hard/different/unexpected for me, because I was hoping 35+ AM and 25+ PM)
Agree with Doug E. I felt like morning session didn’t cover thermo fluids topics enough. However, NCEES only states the number of questions from each subject as an approximate in their specifications. In reality, you are at the mercy of their problem selection. They can ask as many problems from each section as they want. I don’t know how their problem selection approval process goes. I do agree the morning session was also a surprise to me and harder due to limited thermo fluids questions.
Now I am wondering which of the A.M. portion was the one that the test takers would expect? Thermal-Fluids was not, now we saw that the MDM also was off a little bit. Strange.This wast the first ( and hopefully my last) time I take the PE Machine Design exam.
The majority of the AM exam did not reflect the problems in the four practice exams I took, on top of a 20 week review course.
The afternoon exam was more difficult, however, I was able to recognize more of the problems from my study material.
If I were to ***** my results it would be AM 30+ , PM 30+ .
Out of curiosity I looked at the Page 5 of the latest NCEES Practice Exam regarding the Approximate Number for questions from each section. It says Basic Engineering Practice Section shows Approximate 6 problems and Supportive Knowledge Section Shows Approximate 4 questions with a total of 10 questions. This includes AM and PM Sections out of 80 problems. Now, the Practice Exam only had 8-9 questions total for these sections. The October 2019 exam had at least 20 questions total out of these sections. The question is can you sue NCEES for something like this without a proof since they don't provide the questions after the exam? They definitely did not stick with their own exam specification. Being and engineer, following industry standards and client's standards is a must. So what NCEES did with the October 2019 Exam is against their Ethics of Engineering. They better grade the Thermo Fluids Sections higher for the cut scores.Now I am wondering which of the A.M. portion was the one that the test takers would expect? Thermal-Fluids was not, now we saw that the MDM also was off a little bit. Strange.