That's what I thought too! I assumed it wasn't the real feed they show just a low quality reproduction for the media^^
I don't see how that "object" is distinguishable from just a reflection off a wave.
I don't remember what school it was for but my husband had to take a test in-flight at some elevation with out oxygen... the test looked like something maybe a 1st grader may take and most of the people couldn't do it. (like "draw hands on the clock so it says 12:50" type questions)http://flightsafety.org/hf/hf_may-jun97.pdf
"At very high alltitudes (45,000 feet) or higher even the use of 100 percent oxygen will not sustain conciousness because of the increased volume of water vapor and CO2 in the lungs, Above 33,000 feet to breathe normally, the lungs must be pressurized by some mechanical means"
Anything sustained over 12,500 ft MSL in an aircraft requires oxygen. They allow temporary operation (max 30 minutes) up to 14,500.Not the same but I can attest that breathing at 13,500 feet is difficult even if your not moving... Can't imagine if you doubled that....
Great, now I'm gonna have to go out and take it up to 14.5 just to see if it will do it. I'm too lazy to borrow an oxygen bottle to see just where it stops.I summeted a 14er last summer, meaning that I have been higher above sea level than your airplane has.
I think the technology for transmitting that much data from a flying aircraft isn't quite there yet. I think things are heading that way though as evidenced by the data feeds received by the engine manufacturer.Flyer, do you know why plane data is still stored in black boxes instead of being transmitted to a server off of the plane?
Enter your email address to join: