Capt Worley PE
Run silent, run deep
^You're conspiracy theory makes a good deal of sense.
Um, you did know that GE is going to be the broker of the Cap and Trade program through its capital group right? But there isn't a conflict of interest there or anything. I'll find the article and post it when I'm not so busy.^^^ But at 1.8 cents per KWH, why would you WANT to ramp down a nuclear unit? (presuming you can get it out)
One question I would like to ask is how many steak dinners did GE have to provide before the Chairman of FERC agreed to memorize and quote their sales brochure? Or was it something other than steaks, hmm?
I'm about one rational brain cell short of signing onto a conspiracy theory that GE, through the media outlet it owns and through it's political contributions, is fomenting a faux global warming/ CO2/carbon crisis to position itself as the administrator of a federally mandated Cap & Trade program on carbon emissions and preferred provider of renewable energy through it's wind group. Somebody noted to me that the Westinghouse AP design does seem to be winning the domestic nuke race.
Then I heard a quote the other day attributed to Harry Reid (sorry, don't know the source) that said we need a Cap & Trade program ...because the government "needs that income to pay for the healthcare plan".
HFS. Don't Panic?
5% per minute ramp load changes between 25% and 100% of full operating power. Load follow <10% at +- 2% per minute.The statement that you can't ramp a nuke is partially correct. The current nuclear fleet is no good for peeking duty. Rapid load changes cause fuel rods to fail early. I'm not sure what types of load following the new units are designed for.
The plant I started at, 2 1130MWe units commissioned in the early '80s, would never put up with that. We would have been tripping off-line once a week.5% per minute ramp load changes between 25% and 100% of full operating power.
Did you ever notice math majors can't do math? All they can do is proofs and theoretical stuff.For having two math degrees, he sure sucks at basic algebra.
Heard this one also. Nice, real nice.^^^ But at 1.8 cents per KWH, why would you WANT to ramp down a nuclear unit? (presuming you can get it out)
Then I heard a quote the other day attributed to Harry Reid (sorry, don't know the source) that said we need a Cap & Trade program ...because the government "needs that income to pay for the healthcare plan".
...Somebody noted to me that the Westinghouse AP design does seem to be winning the domestic nuke race.
I'm pretty sure South Texas is going with a BWR design built by Toshiba. All the others that I'm aware of are going with the AP1000.All six of the domestic contracts for new nuclear power is the AP1000 design. No shocker there, as Shaw/Stone & Webster is doing the EPC on all of them and they own a 20% stake in Westinghouse.
Very well may be, I only knew of the SC, GA, and FL jobs as being locked in.I'm pretty sure South Texas is going with a BWR design built by Toshiba. All the others that I'm aware of are going with the AP1000.
Enter your email address to join: