Colorado claims the right to all rain within the state

Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum

Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Capt Worley PE

Run silent, run deep
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
13,369
Reaction score
649
Location
SC
Colorado water law declares that the state of Colorado claims the right to all moisture in the atmosphere that falls within its borders and that “said moisture is declared to be the property of the people of this state, dedicated to their use pursuant” to
the Colorado constitution.
http://water.state.co.us/DWRIPub/Documents/DWR_RainwaterFlyer.pdf

So, you can light a fattie, but not collect rainwater!

Weird.

 
That is sad to the point of awesome. HTF does a law like this even get enforced? Seriously, if you have a small rain collection tank on the side of your house, you're going to get fined for conserving resources? Saving the earth? IN A HIPPIE STATE?

 
Yeah but with the rain barrels you will eventually be placing it on the ground anyways so there isn't a loss of water...it is just a delayed rain event.

 
Yeah but with the rain barrels you will eventually be placing it on the ground anyways so there isn't a loss of water...it is just a delayed rain event.








Question: Since I’m trying to conserve and cut
back on the use from my water supplier, am I
allowed to collect precipitation for watering my
land-scaping and to fill a decorative pond?

Answer: No. First, because you receive your
water supply through a tap from a water supplier,
you may not collect precipitation at all. The
changes in Senate Bill 09 -080 apply only to residential properties that are supplied by a well (or
could qualify for a well permit). Second, you will
not be able to use the precipitation you’ve
collected to fill a pond since that use would not be
allowed on the appropriate well permits
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah but with the rain barrels you will eventually be placing it on the ground anyways so there isn't a loss of water...it is just a delayed rain event.








>

Question: Since I’m trying to conserve and cut
back on the use from my water supplier, am I
allowed to collect precipitation for watering my
land-scaping and to fill a decorative pond?

Answer: No. First, because you receive your
water supply through a tap from a water supplier,
you may not collect precipitation at all. The
changes in Senate Bill 09 -080 apply only to residential properties that are supplied by a well (or
could qualify for a well permit). Second, you will
not be able to use the precipitation you’ve
collected to fill a pond since that use would not be
allowed on the appropriate well permits






from the way that is written...then swimming pools just became outlawed too. Because they collect precipitation

 
From what I've seen/read about this issue, it mostly stems from the fact that 1) we're going through a couple years of serious drought conditions (which makes seniority and water rights battles VERY brutal between farmers/ranchers, cities, counties, water districts, etc), and 2) West Nile virus has been spreading across the state very rapidly and most people who collect rainwater only manage to successfully create mosquito breeding grounds.

 
From what I've seen/read about this issue, it mostly stems from the fact that 1) we're going through a couple years of serious drought conditions (which makes seniority and water rights battles VERY brutal between farmers/ranchers, cities, counties, water districts, etc), and 2) West Nile virus has been spreading across the state very rapidly and most people who collect rainwater only manage to successfully create mosquito breeding grounds.


That's all well and good, but it doesn't make a case for the government telling me that I can't keep rain that fell on my house.

 
From what I've seen/read about this issue, it mostly stems from the fact that 1) we're going through a couple years of serious drought conditions (which makes seniority and water rights battles VERY brutal between farmers/ranchers, cities, counties, water districts, etc), and 2) West Nile virus has been spreading across the state very rapidly and most people who collect rainwater only manage to successfully create mosquito breeding grounds.
So again the carelessness of the few ruin it for everyone else...I would have a hard time believing the supreme court would uphold this law...what mother nature drops onto my property is my property, this isn't a government owned conservation ground yet!

 
Speaking as a Colorado resident on well water, this law was an improvement to the old. They used to not allow us to collect any rain water for external home use. If you had a household well, you could use it outside at all. I was tagged and nearly fined for watering outside with rain water I collected. If I had a domestic well, I could water outside. Now, we can collect water and use it in the ayrd.

It's a big no-no to wash our cars. I find it crazy that the water that flows from the mountains I live in can be spread all over Vegas and Southern California, but I can;t have an outside hot tub or wash my car, but at least I am allowed to collect a small amount of rain water to have a few flowers.

Wish I was one of the rich lawyers who purchased all the H2O rights long ago. They sell permits for exterior use, but they're not cheap.

 
Ga tried this a few years ago during our drought but the Feds quickly intervened and said that states don't have the ability to claim water that flows through their state.. I'm sure they will do the same..

 

Latest posts

Back
Top