The course is going well. The practice problems are challenging. The structural breadth questions seem to more depth level questions. The instructors are helpful.
Do the homework problem compare similar to the actual exam questions? Some of the examples seem challenging.
I am just getting through the structural (breadth topic) now. The structural instruction seems to be lacking compared to the rest of the material I've seen. I feel like a lot of concepts of very lightly covered with little equations related to actual problems. It's going to take a lot more studying on my own to bridge the gap.
Super, I am in the course right now. I agree with your statement about the structural breadth. Also losing a bit of motivation because I am unsure if my state board will let me sit for the exam for the spring. My work hours are right on the border so we will see.
Did you feel like the reinforced concrete and steel design was a little overkill for breadth?
I am a bit overwhelmed. I am planning to take all three exams and I am having a difficult time trying to manage studying for each test. Seismic takes alot of time and the EET course helps. The surveying is difficult to work on since most of my work is self-study. The 8 hours is alot of information. I think the EET course is good, but some of the homework is hard. The lectures are long and the frustrating part is some students ask questions that are not on the particular topic being cover, this ruins the flow of the class. I think the structural breadth was more covering the structural depth. I am planning to take the structural depth and most of the problems seemed like depth problems. The practice problems were more challenging than the quiz.
Studying for 2 other tests on top of everything does sound overwhelming.
These are also in the appendix of the CERM. Printing out the attached though would be much easier flipping through than the CERM.
