This might sound like a silly question but I am planning to take the SE lateral this October and was wondering if the Seismic Design Manual 3rd edition is a "must have" for the exam? The reason I am asking is when I was studying for the vertical exam I bought the TMS 402/602 and AISI S100 codes which I never used. The steel manual is expensive and was wondering if I can avoid buying it.
Is the AISC Seismic Design Manual essential to have for the SE lateral exam?
- Thread starter Reed D
- Start date
Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:
There will be AM questions that require it and the PM may heavily need it or it may not. You might be able to get by if you have good study reference material AND get lucky on the AM/PM topics but you would be taking a real gamble not having it.
Titleistguy
Well-known member
Is this is a serious question?
Titleistguy
Well-known member
Let’s go down the line here a bit...
Some of the things you’ll need the SDM for (but not limited to):
1. Anything RBS, and more broadly related to IMF, SMF prequalified connections (unless you roll with a loose copy of AISC 358 randomly)
2. I don’t know, ummm, the specification itself has some relevance, could be useful to say the least
3. The examples problems are nice and great learning tools
4. The specification commentary and the discussions in general in many of the separate sections and chapters is highly useful
5. To me half of this test isn’t just a pump and dump of info but it’s learning the codes, their layouts, how they shine, where they’re terrible...and so on, and frankly, AISC 341 is one of the better overall codes IMO when compared to the others required for the test
Some of the things you’ll need the SDM for (but not limited to):
1. Anything RBS, and more broadly related to IMF, SMF prequalified connections (unless you roll with a loose copy of AISC 358 randomly)
2. I don’t know, ummm, the specification itself has some relevance, could be useful to say the least
3. The examples problems are nice and great learning tools
4. The specification commentary and the discussions in general in many of the separate sections and chapters is highly useful
5. To me half of this test isn’t just a pump and dump of info but it’s learning the codes, their layouts, how they shine, where they’re terrible...and so on, and frankly, AISC 341 is one of the better overall codes IMO when compared to the others required for the test
Last edited:
EBAT75
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 45
Without limiting my comments as responses to other comments posted here is how I looked at it.
I do not have the 3rd Edition to be able to pass judgement on its utility for the exam purposes, but from how the codes go from edition to new and improved, I am generally skeptical.
Yes, there are many useful time saving tables between the first and second editions. But the examples were a bit of an overkill. They are not simpler versions as in the first edition which reinforce the application of code rather than voluminous solutions.
I agree the Seismic Specifications and Commentary are much more direct and easier to apply than other codes/specifications.
Whether spending money on the Third Edition is worth, only the individual can examine the benefit-cost tradeoff, risk, and decide.
I do not have the 3rd Edition to be able to pass judgement on its utility for the exam purposes, but from how the codes go from edition to new and improved, I am generally skeptical.
Yes, there are many useful time saving tables between the first and second editions. But the examples were a bit of an overkill. They are not simpler versions as in the first edition which reinforce the application of code rather than voluminous solutions.
I agree the Seismic Specifications and Commentary are much more direct and easier to apply than other codes/specifications.
Whether spending money on the Third Edition is worth, only the individual can examine the benefit-cost tradeoff, risk, and decide.
Do you own the 2nd edition and are talking about only the changes between that and the new one? I can’t comment on the differences, but that’s possible to survive with... if you take no SDM at all, very risky imo. I would think it would be difficult to learn the ins and outs of designing the various steel LFRSs without it.
No, I don't own the 2nd edition. thank you for asking. I should have provided a little more explanation.
I haven't done any steel seismic design before so I really have no clue how much the SDM is needed for the lateral exam. I know there is no way to pass the vertical without the AISC 14th but I wasn't sure if this is the case for the SDM for the lateral exam. I just wanted to make sure that it's a must have code before I buy it. It looks like it is. Thank you all for the responses.
Titleistguy
Well-known member
If you’re gonna skip a code, a very compelling argument for the TMS can be made as well as the AISI. That said, the remaining ones are non negotiable and there will be (well almost certainly will be) straight look up questions out of the SDM.
Also, and not to beat a dead horse, given your light steel seimic background, I’d recommend the SDM just to read the discussions on R=3 systems, learning about Ry, and expected strengths and so on. It’s worth it.
It does suck that the 3rd edition is printed on basically Kleenex and has a soft cover now but whatya gonna do.
Also, and not to beat a dead horse, given your light steel seimic background, I’d recommend the SDM just to read the discussions on R=3 systems, learning about Ry, and expected strengths and so on. It’s worth it.
It does suck that the 3rd edition is printed on basically Kleenex and has a soft cover now but whatya gonna do.
Titleistguy
Well-known member
One last point — you’re correct, the examples are long. So what I did was I outlined them, each example has its number, bold sub headings and italicized non bold sub sub headings…. Which begs for an outline format so when you need to check a very specific application of a thing … it’ll be very findable.
Engineerbabu
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2019
- Messages
- 63
- Reaction score
- 68
The short and sweet answer is YES!
Just as an FYI, there is now a new variable in the new seismic specifications.
I've been using the new manual for almost a year now. It is similar to the 2nd edition but when it comes to taking the SE exam, don't cheap out or else you'll be kicking yourself.
Plus, if you are an AISC member, I think you can get a 15th edition manual plus the new 3rd edition seismic design manual for $300. Well worth it IMO.
Oh and I'm not a fan of the softcover. **** you AISC!
I've been using the new manual for almost a year now. It is similar to the 2nd edition but when it comes to taking the SE exam, don't cheap out or else you'll be kicking yourself.
Plus, if you are an AISC member, I think you can get a 15th edition manual plus the new 3rd edition seismic design manual for $300. Well worth it IMO.
Oh and I'm not a fan of the softcover. **** you AISC!
Titleistguy
Well-known member
I can deal with the soft cover but the unhighlightable pages makes me hate hate hate it, oh yea, Ec is it? Something like that? Finally a variable for the mysterious catch all of “….or whatever the system can deliver”
No, it's an "alpha" term. It's used in different systems for certain force terms.
Still, in practice I don't see the point in the "system can deliver" part of the code. You may get slightly heavier steel and more robust connections. You are still on the hook if anything goes south. Too bad you can't hide behind codes. Thanks lawyers!
Still, in practice I don't see the point in the "system can deliver" part of the code. You may get slightly heavier steel and more robust connections. You are still on the hook if anything goes south. Too bad you can't hide behind codes. Thanks lawyers!
Titleistguy
Well-known member
Yeaaaaaaa that’s what it is. Ec may be asce7-16 diaphragm thing or something, haven’t really done any prep yet, I guess I’m naively hoping I pass this time but completely agree on the system bit…. One of those vague off ramps (or on ramp depending lol) that the code gives for itself to hide behind I think lol!
Reverse Polish
Well-known member
My take is this: Even at regular (non-AISC member) price, the Seismic Design Manual is still cheaper than the $500 it will cost to take the exam again. Given that the bulk of the lateral exam is seismic material--and a good chunk of that is expected to be structural steel--there's no excuse for not having the reference. I see that as part of the responsibility of being a licensed Structural Engineer.
@Reed D asked a legitimate question for someone who hasn't done seismic design in steel before - no need to rake them through the coals for asking a question.
I have never dealt with these folks, but here is a cheap option:
https://www.techstreet.com/standard...3i37Uxcku3m4Vqse9ZNbHF9ns26vOBHIaAv5vEALw_wcB
https://www.techstreet.com/standard...3i37Uxcku3m4Vqse9ZNbHF9ns26vOBHIaAv5vEALw_wcB
Similar threads
