M
mmmbeer
Example 20.3 Page 20-8 Cerm 8th edition
i am following this example all the way through UNTILL we go to calculate V=PA(d)
in part (a) of the problem we JUST calculated P as 1.375 in.
so WHY in the name of all thats right and good are we using 1.0 in/in for P in part ( to find the Flood Volume???
why bother to calculate P in part a if we can just use 1.0 in???
i am confused . .
can someone help me to understand this?
THANKS
i am following this example all the way through UNTILL we go to calculate V=PA(d)
in part (a) of the problem we JUST calculated P as 1.375 in.
so WHY in the name of all thats right and good are we using 1.0 in/in for P in part ( to find the Flood Volume???
why bother to calculate P in part a if we can just use 1.0 in???
i am confused . .
can someone help me to understand this?
THANKS
Last edited: