They really get you to understand the fundamentals and work out problems slightly more complex than what's on the exam, which is a good thing when the test gives you information that you previously had to solve for when studying for the exam.
Not sure what you mean by "understand the fundamentals", but I'm a Testmasters fan because they take the opposite approach: if you want to learn someone, take a college course; if you want to pass an exam; apply these strategies. Rather than explain theory, they focused on approach.
Thanks for the recommendation. I'll check them out. I like the approach.
Spot on. I knew 2 people who could of passed it, but didn't. They had no test strategy.
There are easy questions, but you need to read the question well. You need to manage your time, pass hard question or ones that gave you problems in the past.
This is a test of some fundamental topics, not every nook and cranny in the business.
I'm sure the exam makers put some questions in to suck your time down.
Going back to the fail guys. They were a bit iffy on the subject matter. However, they just plowed through the test, 1 then 2 then 3 then....... times up.
Instread of struggling with those last few hard questions, go back and check your work on the easy ones. Not redo the problems. Figure out a method that assures a quality answer in another way than basically solving it. Is the answer in PSI, yes. Does the equations you used match up to the original question asked?
You have to correctly answer 70% of the questions. Focus on the 70% you know well. The other 30% are buffer questions.
The breadth questions I studied were close to the afternoon questions. So, don't sweat the oddball questions. Knock down the ones the reoccur in practice exams.
Do live tests. 4 hours of straight concentration. I never did so much math work in one day before studying or taking this test. Just like real world. Focus on what you know, then work on what you don't know. And like in the real world, you can't do it all yourself. You however can do a big chunk. Proficiency is not perfection.