Change 'limited operating budgets' to 'limitless government grants', change 'to ruin the economy' to 'gain control of energy production' and the decision changes radically...
Agreed. Because I can point to quite a large sampling of people in the scientific or engineering fields that think the exaggerated impacts of global warming are a complete crock of shit, much larger than 10% for that matter.^I would posit that the 90% figure is a little off also. It all depends on how you define the scientific community.
Same here.Agreed. Because I can point to quite a large sampling of people in the scientific or engineering fields that think the exaggerated impacts of global warming are a complete crock of shit, much larger than 10% for that matter.^I would posit that the 90% figure is a little off also. It all depends on how you define the scientific community.
Well, let's make sure we're all clear on this. Are you talking about strictly the impacts of "climate change" or the causes of "climate change". Two very different topics that are easily lost in wording.Agreed. Because I can point to quite a large sampling of people in the scientific or engineering fields that think the exaggerated impacts of global warming are a complete crock of shit, much larger than 10% for that matter.^I would posit that the 90% figure is a little off also. It all depends on how you define the scientific community.
Enter your email address to join: