H
HERO
Hello,
On page 233, problem 3: we have a 6" pipe which contains 180 gasketed joints and three 6" bronze steated gate valves. The question asks us to determine the allowable leakage quantity during a 2 hour time 220 psig hydrostatic test.
In the old NFPA 24-2002, section 10.10.2.2.4( 1), we the use the ratio 2 qt/ht per 100 gaskets or joints to determine the leakage flow rate. For the gate valves, use 10.10.2.2.4 (2), to help us determine the allowable leakage flow rate. We then add the two leakage flow rates and multiply that number by the time factor which gives us the allowable leakage quantity.
However, in the new NFPA 24-2007 edition, when you look that same section 10.10.2.2.4, we have to determine allowable leakage quantity flow rate via equation 10.10.2.2.4 (a). Subsection 1, 2, 3, and 4 are gone! NFPA rewrote the entire code section.
My question: how do I do convert 180 gasketed joints into equivalent length of pipe? I think I’m missing something here. Any input from the Fire Protection or engineering communities is greatly appreciated!
Thank you,
Mark
On page 233, problem 3: we have a 6" pipe which contains 180 gasketed joints and three 6" bronze steated gate valves. The question asks us to determine the allowable leakage quantity during a 2 hour time 220 psig hydrostatic test.
In the old NFPA 24-2002, section 10.10.2.2.4( 1), we the use the ratio 2 qt/ht per 100 gaskets or joints to determine the leakage flow rate. For the gate valves, use 10.10.2.2.4 (2), to help us determine the allowable leakage flow rate. We then add the two leakage flow rates and multiply that number by the time factor which gives us the allowable leakage quantity.
However, in the new NFPA 24-2007 edition, when you look that same section 10.10.2.2.4, we have to determine allowable leakage quantity flow rate via equation 10.10.2.2.4 (a). Subsection 1, 2, 3, and 4 are gone! NFPA rewrote the entire code section.
My question: how do I do convert 180 gasketed joints into equivalent length of pipe? I think I’m missing something here. Any input from the Fire Protection or engineering communities is greatly appreciated!
Thank you,
Mark