Not really. The morning session was too easy for the passing score to be a 65%. Why so obsessed with the highest failing score anyhow? If anyone can get the cut score, it would be @Baconator, ask him.You'll be surprised!
agreed. I would bet it's far more likely the cut score was 58-60 rather than 52-54.Yea that seems low for a test that didn't seem very hard.
That sums up my AM portion of the October 2015 exam.All guess so far. No firm answer!
If everybody gets a 100% would they still fail some?agreed. I would bet it's far more likely the cut score was 58-60 rather than 52-54.
Sarcasm right? I don't read them very well. haha!If everybody gets a 100% would they still fail some?
Human behavior combined with engineer compulsion for data evaluation. Somehow that process of finding out helps you make it through the end of the infuriating experience. So, it makes a difference. "How close was I?", "Should I get a recount?"... That's usually what's behind these kinds of questions. Finding out that you were 1 point from the passing score is demoralizing but gives you the boost in the end that you weren't that far off compared to the bulk of your peers. Finding out that you were 10 questions from passing, is even more demoralizing but in the end it's good to know that you really have to work much harder to get over the curve next time.What difference does it make? It's a pass or fail test.
If a frog had wings would he bump his *** when he jumped?If everybody gets a 100% would they still fail some?
The answer is no - all would pass.Sarcasm right? I don't read them very well. haha!
I'm thinking they wouldn't be able to though. However, I'm thinking if a number of people got 80/80 and a number had 79/80, they would fail those with that 79/80.
Co-worker got 56/80 with a geotech afternoon (70%) and a number of people on this board reported 57/80 but failed.
Human behavior combined with engineer compulsion for data evaluation. Somehow that process of finding out helps you make it through the end of the infuriating experience. So, it makes a difference. "How close was I?", "Should I get a recount?"... That's usually what's behind these kinds of questions. Finding out that you were 1 point from the passing score is demoralizing but gives you the boost in the end that you weren't that far off compared to the bulk of your peers. Finding out that you were 10 questions from passing, is even more demoralizing but in the end it's good to know that you really have to work much harder to get over the curve next time.
Either way, it's psychological. Therefore, I shall not judge.
The probability of every person getting 100% is higher than that of frog having wings.If a frog had wings would he bump his *** when he jumped?
Are you sure about that? evolution has the benefit of continuing as long as there are frogs. The possibility of every person getting 100% is dependant on how long NCEES is the administering party. That said, your question was idiotic to begin with, thus you will get idiotic responses.The probability of every person getting 100% is higher than that of frog having wings.
Frogs would become extinct first before they evolve into flying creatures because of civil engineering activities.Are you sure about that? evolution has the benefit of continuing as long as there are frogs. The possibility of every person getting 100% is dependant on how long NCEES is the administering party. That said, your question was idiotic to begin with, thus you will get idiotic responses.
True. But the opposite will be true once Genetic Engineering comes out of its infancy.The probability of every person getting 100% is higher than that of frog having wings.
But will they be required to take the FE & PE exams? :dunno:True. But the opposite will be true once Genetic Engineering comes out of its infancy.
Enter your email address to join: