So now that I'm no longer in my feelings, I'm ready to get back to work. Someone recommended that I talk about the things I felt that I did well in the last cycle and of course, the things I could do better.
I've been out of school for almost 16 years so I had to start from scratch with a lot of topics.
Strengths
- I was really organized. I tabbed the EET binders, the OSHA reference, ACI reference, and parts of the CERM. I created an index for the EET binders. Shoutout to
@CivInTexas who sent a great template of an old EET keyword index. I updated it and included it at the front of the AM and PM binders.
- I had a separate binder for practice problems. I included solved practice problems from EET practice problems, EET midterm, some 6-minute solutions, and EET simulated 8-hr exam. I created an index for my practice problem binder that included the following columns: NCEES test section/Given/Find
- I also brought the entire EET practice exam solutions in a binder. I created an index for this one as well. (I didn't use this as much)
- I completed two 4-hour timed exams and one 8-hour timed exam. I also bought a pack of scantrons from Amazon and used those during simulated exam, and I always worked from my crates. So what I liked the most about this was that it helped me to become more comfortable with maneuvering during test taking. It's really important to get in the habit of transferring answers to the scantron, to keep up with the scantron, and learn how to move your books around. I actually studied at a 6 foot long table and forced myself to work within a 4-5 foot footprint. I never felt awkward during the exam because I was so used to working this way.
- Variety of practice. I used CERM Practice Problems (useless because they mix breadth and depth questions together. kinda helpful for your depth area), Six Minute Solutions (takes way more than 6 minutes to complete so don't feel bad), Goswami Civil Breadth Exams (harder than the exam but good practice), NCEES Civil Construction Practice Exam (not the same questions as what you will see on the exam but it's a similar level of difficulty - a little more straightforward than some of the tricky problems you'll see), and as mentioned before - the EET practice exams and practice problems.
- I kept a log of my study hours. This kept me honest regarding my coverage of each topic.
- I had all of the required references. My EET binders had most of the information that I needed, however, I forced myself to use my actual references because I needed to learn how to use them just in case the EET binders didn't have something.
Weaknesses
- I studied way too much. That may sound weird and everybody is different but I sacrificed my sleep and my health. I was burned out by the last few weeks. Lesson: Focus on quality study time rather than quantity. Add in time to exercise and more down time/social time.
- I didn't do a good job of populating each section of my practice problem binder. It showed up in my diagnostic report too. I think I started this exercise a little too late during my studying and didn't really get as much in there as I should have. I completed an endless number of problems across three 3-subject spiral notebooks. I couldn't comb through it to pull out problems as efficiently as I thought I could. So some of my divider sections were empty. I knew how to do some of the problems on the exam for these areas, but the practice problems kind of sparked some ideas on how to start a problem. Time savings is key during the exam. I was left staring at some problems for way too long only to realize how to solve it after I sat with it for 10 minutes. That shouldn't happen. Lesson: Solve more problems AND save them and index them in my practice problem binder along the way.
- Wasted time working through CERM Practice Problems. A couple of people on here told me to stay away from these problems (
@youngmotivatedengineer) but I didn't listen. I found myself emailing Nazrul from EET about a couple of them only for him to answer my question and then say "...but that's on Geotechnical depth so I wouldn't worry about that level of detail". I spent 2 days on one problem. Ridiculous.
- I didn't build in time to review my work during the exam. This hurt me bad. The good news is that I completed practice problems at a rate that made me very comfortable with my calculator and transferring information from calculator, to scratch paper, to scantron. The bad news is if I transferred something incorrectly or made some other error, I didn't build in time to check it. I just moved on to the next problem. I felt completely confident with 27 problems in the AM. I got 21 right. That tells me that I made math errors somewhere and I left those points on the table.
- I spent too much time on topics at the beginning of my study plan and didn't return to those subjects. I did really poorly in Project Planning and Means and Methods because I studied those first, throwing almost study hours at those... only to not return until maybe the night before a simulated exam. Lesson: I'm taking a different approach this time around, touching on several subjects in a week. Also dedicate time to the breadth topics towards the end of my study plan.
- I need to understand the application of Hydraulics and Hydrology to practice problems. I understand the ideas but I definitely need practice with applying the equations. So that means more practice!
This might be helpful to someone, not sure. But here ya go.