Ok, you guys don't seem to be fazed by banks' predatory lending practices on mortgages. "Blame the consumer, they're stupid!" you say. "Businesses should be allowed to make a profit any way they want!"
Well, how about this:
So essentially, after the fact, the credit card company is unilaterally changing the contract terms to include an extra fee, because the bank made a bad decision on the terms of these cards in the first place, and God forbid a business actually lose money due to a bad decision. And of course the consumer has absolutely no leverage in this situation. In the old days, a person's word meant something. Apparently this doesn't apply to businesses. They can change their contracts willy-nilly, and that's just fine. Let's hold consumers responsible for their bad decisions, but not corporations.
On top of this article, I got home today to find a letter from Capital One telling me the fixed rate 7.9% card I have had for 5 years is now going to be a variable rate card at 14.65% + prime (17.9% right now). This is the same card they cut my limit on from $10,000 to $4,100 a while back. And I don't have bad credit; my score is 805. My only recourse is to close my account and lose my rewards points. It's not a big deal since I never carry a balance, but it still pisses me off.
So what say you? I know Flyer's response already. "In a free market, people will leave these banks and demand something better, and a competitive market will provide," but guess what--there aren't really any alternatives. Although I am seriously consdering getting a credit card with my credit union. At least they work for me rather than some CEO raking in billions per year.
Well, how about this:
Quoted from Yahoo Finance.A credit score of more than 800 wasn't enough to save Lee Frizzell of Farmington Hills, Mich., from Chase's new policy, which took effect in January. Chase is tacking on a $10 monthly service charge to many low-rate accounts with big debts held for more than two years. The fee is added to the balance, where it earns interest just like any other charge. Chase also raised the minimum monthly payment from 2% of the balance to 5% for affected cardholders. Frizzell has $12,000 in debt on his $35,000-limit card from three years ago, when he consolidated his bills to take advantage of an offer promising a rate of 3.99% for the life of the balance. "It was the cheapest rate around," he says. "Now they're trying to renege on the deal."
So essentially, after the fact, the credit card company is unilaterally changing the contract terms to include an extra fee, because the bank made a bad decision on the terms of these cards in the first place, and God forbid a business actually lose money due to a bad decision. And of course the consumer has absolutely no leverage in this situation. In the old days, a person's word meant something. Apparently this doesn't apply to businesses. They can change their contracts willy-nilly, and that's just fine. Let's hold consumers responsible for their bad decisions, but not corporations.
On top of this article, I got home today to find a letter from Capital One telling me the fixed rate 7.9% card I have had for 5 years is now going to be a variable rate card at 14.65% + prime (17.9% right now). This is the same card they cut my limit on from $10,000 to $4,100 a while back. And I don't have bad credit; my score is 805. My only recourse is to close my account and lose my rewards points. It's not a big deal since I never carry a balance, but it still pisses me off.
So what say you? I know Flyer's response already. "In a free market, people will leave these banks and demand something better, and a competitive market will provide," but guess what--there aren't really any alternatives. Although I am seriously consdering getting a credit card with my credit union. At least they work for me rather than some CEO raking in billions per year.
Last edited by a moderator: