Rafael Sabelli on the latest AISC podcast has a joke that only us seismically-trained structurals would know.
There was once a discussion among the SEAOC seismic committee on what response modification factor to give for an OCBF. There was a belief that one could use 5, but with the overstrength factor being 2, some were wondering why it couldn't be 2.5. Well, many believed it should be somewhere in between and the number 4 and number 3.5 were brought up. Finally, someone mentioned the number 3.25. Rafael brought up that the number PI should be used and that especially brought irritation to the committee chair, upon which he stated, "Now Rafael, that's just irrational."
HA!
There was once a discussion among the SEAOC seismic committee on what response modification factor to give for an OCBF. There was a belief that one could use 5, but with the overstrength factor being 2, some were wondering why it couldn't be 2.5. Well, many believed it should be somewhere in between and the number 4 and number 3.5 were brought up. Finally, someone mentioned the number 3.25. Rafael brought up that the number PI should be used and that especially brought irritation to the committee chair, upon which he stated, "Now Rafael, that's just irrational."
HA!
Last edited by a moderator: