Search results

I accept that it is not a real test.

What I mean by a cut score is that there's no absolute correct solution set and that the passing score has to be determined based on how others perform. For that reason, it is not a real test.

Where I took it, they grade you on the spot with an answer sheet in front of them, and tell you whether you fail or not.

Yep, should be nothing or all. Is there a cut score for the driver's test?

A test with a cut score isn't a real test.

Nobody in the tech industry cares about PE, only true talent and skills. Use your time and hone real skills.

Just go and work in the tech industry, no need PE.

You don't need PE in oil and gas industry.

Frogs would become extinct first before they evolve into flying creatures because of civil engineering activities.

How about just not working in fields not related to civil engineering. Try oil and gas industry.

The probability of every person getting 100% is higher than that of frog having wings.

If everybody gets a 100% would they still fail some?

That's a cliched statement. The exam tests neither responsibility nor competency as an engineer. 

Not reward hard working engineers? That sounds like discrimination. Aren't the test developers engineers and have been developing the questions for decades? Examinees getting high/decent scores does not imply that the test was easy or hard.

I'm saying if people got a decent score then why fail them?

A test that aims to trick you isn't a real test. Are you in a profession that sets out to trick and trap others?

Not all states accept manual verification anyway.

Someone commented on my response - that person understood the meaning.

Easy is relative. If people are doing well in the exam, why should they discredited?

 Did the prof take PE and SE?