crogmobulon
Active member
Problem # 13 in 6-Minute Solutions Geotechnical describes a square footing on clayey-sand, and asks to solve for qult using the Terzaghi-Meyerhof equation.
In the CERM (11th) it states that this equation (36.1) is appropriate for a foundation in a continuous wall footing, and that shape factor corrections need to be applied to the Terzaghi bearing capacity factors Nc & Ngamma. The respective shape factor multipliers are provided in Tables 36.4 & 36.5.
Seems pretty straight forward, but when I did problem #13 in 6-Min., I of course came up with the wrong answer. When I checked their solution, they used the same bearing capacity factors that I pulled from Table 36.2 of CERM without applying the shape factor multipliers for the square footing. No reason was given in the solution for why these multipliers were not used.
Which approach is correct?
It's this kind of inconsistency that is really shaking my confidence.
In the CERM (11th) it states that this equation (36.1) is appropriate for a foundation in a continuous wall footing, and that shape factor corrections need to be applied to the Terzaghi bearing capacity factors Nc & Ngamma. The respective shape factor multipliers are provided in Tables 36.4 & 36.5.
Seems pretty straight forward, but when I did problem #13 in 6-Min., I of course came up with the wrong answer. When I checked their solution, they used the same bearing capacity factors that I pulled from Table 36.2 of CERM without applying the shape factor multipliers for the square footing. No reason was given in the solution for why these multipliers were not used.
Which approach is correct?
It's this kind of inconsistency that is really shaking my confidence.