Search results

From my experience writing the 2019 October PE Civil Structural, the School of PE notes I had was a good "refresher" for the AM but was utterly useless for the PM so I wouldn't worry about a PM review course IMHO. Full disclosure: I am a Canadian with negligible experience using American codes...

Perhaps this may simplify your answer but Options #2 and #3 are for the SE, not the PE. The SE is the "next" step above PE (PE is a pre-requisite), is very advanced (not a dig at anyone's intelligence, but the pass rates are VERY low), and is comprised of an 8-hour vertical forces exam and an...

PE Civil: Structural in Maine for me. Breadth: NCEES practice exam (2014) was a good measuring stick. I primarily used the FE Reference Manual if I needed a formula and if I didn't know what to do, I used the Index on Lindeburg's CERM to search for a keyword. I used 2.75 of the 4 hours. Depth...

My poor soul probably could have used another sentence like "previous marks are ok though, dude" 😅

Canadian writing in Maine. I get the part about writing in test questions; that makes sense. The interpretation I had was even writing in a formula or something would be "grounds for dismissal", which seems excessive. Perhaps the correct interpretation was you could not actively write in the...

Thanks for sharing the post!  I wrote PE Civil Structural. Compared to the other exams, those writing this exam probably had the most reference material to bring in. I was a bit caught off guard that there was a rule there "could not be any hand writing in your reference material". I...

Table 8-2 from AISC 14th Edition is the primary reference. I do not see a situation where this would not cover a question related to a weld detail or symbol definition. Good luck!

Hello. Feel free to DM me if  you would like to exchange some studying or practice exam materials.