Search results

Just got the result in the mail and.......I PASSED.

Tennessee still held in suspense!!!

Congrats Marie!

Mine says the same thing. I don't think it means you have passed. My status on the registration page has said that for a few days.

That is good to know. Did she say anything about results being posted on the NCEES website?

Every other state has a thread so I decided to start one for Tennessee. NCEES released the results to the Tennessee Board of Architectural and Engineering Examiners today (5/25/2011). W.F. at the Board has not seen the results yet but expects to see them in the next couple of days. Way to go...

All I know is Tennessee does not allow NCEES to give out results. The Board has to notify you. I do know NCEES released the results to the TN Board of Arc. and Eng. Examiners today.

NCEES released the results for the PE in Tennessee to the Board today.

Unfortunately not. A lot of folks in this forum (from what I read) have taken the "School of PE" webinar. Also, Gaswami (he has a PE reference book that is very good - I would recommend) teaches a class. I hear it is one of the best and he has lots of practice material he has created that is...

I took Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers (MnSPE) review course - webinar. It was a very good refresher course. You need the NCEES practice exam and CERM for water resources and environmental exam. After taking this exam in April 2011, I found these two sources as the best references...

HAHA, SAME HERE! The thought of disappointment is brutal.

Marie, I was a biosystems engineering major also....where did you goto school?

Marie, I, too, was not a Civil Engineering major and I never had a structures class or geotechnical engineering class. I do agree that there were a few "non-numerical" answers that took some thought and or a good dictionary to solve on both the morning and afternoon sessions. I hate this 10...

I am just curious as to what everyone who took the water resource and environmental exam thinks about it? I felt like the AM portion was weighted strongly towards structures and geotechnical (for which I did not prepare very well for). The PM portion I felt was reasonable and actually easier...

I always solve for depth using Manning's equation. As long as you can do the math, I find it easier than using the table. Also, if you are given the flow rate and it does not say "critical flow rate," you can assume you are solving for the normal depth. This sounds like a uniform flow problem.