Search results

According to the picture on pg. 24-25, for the movement of A to D requires one lane change and movement B to C requires no lane change since B can just merge onto C, therefore according to Exh. 24-5, the weaving type is B. Hope that helps.

Just got my certificate today in the mail.. I'm in the Los Angeles Area... and yes the date on the thing says Jan 5 2010

My only recommendations to you is to study the Lindeburg book really well and do all the sample problems. I took the EIT about 5 years after graduating too.. and to make things worse I got my degree in EE in which I took one class of statics, and never took fluid dynamics or thermodynamics or...

http://www.pels.ca.gov/applicants/appintrope.shtml Qualifying experience are the same amount as the other PE disciplines... It requires at least 2 years of traffic engineering work and 4 years of engineering degree. You must also have an EIT.. otherwise I think 15 years of experience is ok...

I got my results for Traffic Engineering.. not the Transportation Depth for the Civil Engineering PE.. so I'm not messing with anyone's head... FYI, CA offers a License in Traffic Engineering....DOH!!!

Yes, even though I got my results, it is bizarre for the rest of the disciplines... I don't get why they do things the way they do... Hopefully, they don't change the date again...I wish you all a good luck...

I got my mail today and I got my PE Results for CA Traffic. I thought that the results got moved to next week, but I guess not for a small discipline like mine.

I don't know if this makes a difference but, I just used this formula: R = V^2/[15*(0.01e + f)] and solved for e.

Are you asking about no passing zones and directional split? If so, both of these factors affect the flow rate on a two-lane highway (Ch. 12 & 20) and the final product determining LOS which in this case would be the Percent Time-Spent Following. Look at the formula on page 20-9 and 20-10 to...

My advice is to take the general afternoon. SInce you're already studying for the AM general, the PM just takes longer to do, but same concept as Am. That way, the only book you need is the lindeburg FE book. If you can do the practice problems in that book, then you're set.

sure... hopefully i can answer it... Sorry I have to post it here.. i couldn't reply to your PM since the mailbox is full.

You can look at Exh. 24-7 and see if your value of "Nw" is more than the maximum or not. If it is more than the max "Nw", then it's constrained, if it's less than or equal to the max, then it's unconstrained.

I don't really know the answer to the questions... so please let me know if I'm right or wrong, but anyway, my guess is 1) inadequate sight distance at intersections - because i think most accidents occur at intersections that have conflicting moves in which involves pedestrians, bicylists, and...