Took Survey in June and I think I guessed on a few too many for my comfort, while being confident on only 35-38 questions. The exam wasn't very difficult, but the time rush is wild. I think I selected a number of wrong questions to skip, as in I could have done those within a reasonable time...
Notes written in pencil is definitely not a problem in California. Depends on your states but applicants without the intent to cheat shouldn't have to worry about this, so that's what I did, not worry about it.
I, for one, don’t see a problem with the way things are.
Also, SE is definitely a separate forum on its own with its arguably hardest ever created 16-hour exam.
PE Structural is very very heavy on building and very very light on bridge, I'd think go for Transportation fits your situation better. If you can prove competency for what you're stamping based on experience, I don't see an issue.
I'm saying you are in no better position to say other predictions are misguided information. No one knows interpolation is even valid, or if it's linear. Also, your data is extremely limited.
Anyways, you're entitled to your opinion.
I'd say 50-51 is more misguided than 54-57, though determining cut score is such a pointless effort. What makes your information better than anyone else's?
Hey I was just wondering how you did, didn't know you pushed it to Oct! Might be a good decision since from what I have heard the PM was crazy hard this April.
The more problems you practice, the less surprises you will likely see in the exam. Hopefully that will be enough to pass :)
Sounds like you need a new boss yesterday.
Depends on the state boards, other PEs can sign for your experience, it doesn't have to be your direct supervisor or bust.