I posted the specs above. Everything my manager wrote has to do with design (traffic/tranportation/ITS). The specs above make it extremely difficult. Analyses and calculations typically relate to planning and they don't like that.
Basically, if you have the TE you still cannot stamp anything. It's ironic that you need a PE Civil license to stamp traffic plans and yet they don't qualify traffic (in CA) as experience.
These people you know took the test in the CIVIL PE in CA? I know I qualify for the TE with no problems. I just need help in wording the application on the CIVIL PE (I know many people have taken it and have gotten approved)
The rules set by the board are not the clearest.
Here is a set of the rules
6730.2. Requirement for responsible charge
It is the intent of the Legislature that the registration requirements that are imposed upon private sector professional engineers and engineering partnerships, firms, or...
I work for a traffic firm but we also do Civil Engineering which I am not involved in. Typically a traffic consulting firm does
Traffic Engineering
Traffic Signal Engineering and System Synchronization
Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study
Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Study...
My manager talked to one of the expert people the board has. She was telling him not to use the word traffic in anywhere. She was telling him that signing and stripping, traffic control plans, and other traffic/transportation related descriptions don't count.
I am planning to take the PE CIVIL exam in October 2011.
The problem. My supervisor (who has over 20 years experience in traffic design and planning) recently applied and got denied. The board disqualified all his experience because they don't consider traffic related work to be Civil work...