Try this thread.
NEC Practice Problems
There is a link at one of the posts where you can download practice problems.
Good luck
Hope you were able to download the material. Let us know if you have questions.That is some help, thank you
The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
Is the methodology incorrect? On the utility side, I rarely use the NEC, so I am trying to learn/understand these problems.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
Be careful with this article, example 18 and 19 are also incorrect.
Isn't the 30 amp limitation for 240.4D new for 2008, and this set of questions based on 2005? So my 'guess' would be for 2005, the answers are correct, but not for us using 2008.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
I agree that it seems incorrect. However, I think the answer should be 30 amps because 240.4D states that the 30 amp limit is applied after correction factors are applied.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
I would also appreciate an explanation of what is wrong with examples 18 and 19.Is the methodology incorrect? On the utility side, I rarely use the NEC, so I am trying to learn/understand these problems.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
Be careful with this article, example 18 and 19 are also incorrect.
You are probably right. That 2005 version was the one I used in 2006.I agree that it seems incorrect. However, I think the answer should be 30 amps because 240.4D states that the 30 amp limit is applied after correction factors are applied.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
Problem 18I would also appreciate an explanation of what is wrong with examples 18 and 19.Is the methodology incorrect? On the utility side, I rarely use the NEC, so I am trying to learn/understand these problems.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
Be careful with this article, example 18 and 19 are also incorrect.
The NEC does allow the 39.2 A and 33.8 A values, but only if 35 A and 29.9 A are not high enough to prevent the motor from tripping on start up. The problems didn't seem clear what it was asking, but I assumed they meant the 39.2 A and 33.8 A values because problems 16 and 17 already used 35 A and 29.9 A.Problem 18I would also appreciate an explanation of what is wrong with examples 18 and 19.Is the methodology incorrect? On the utility side, I rarely use the NEC, so I am trying to learn/understand these problems.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
Be careful with this article, example 18 and 19 are also incorrect.
Per 2008 NEC code section 430.32(1), for motors with service factor 1.15 or greater
1.25 * 28 = 35A and not 1.4 * 28 = 39.2A as indicated.
Problem 19
Per 2008 NEC code section 430.32(1) for motors with temp rise over 40 deg, all other motors
1.15 * 26 = 29.9 and not 1.3 *26 = 33.8
I agree that it seems incorrect. However, I think the answer should be 30 amps because 240.4D states that the 30 amp limit is applied after correction factors are applied.The example number 11 " What is the ampacity of a #10 ZW2 conductor in a raceway with 5 current carrying conductors?" They have an answer of 32 amps.
Does anyone think it's incorrect?
I got 30amps ( see table 310.16 and 240.4D) X 0.8 (see table 310.15.B.2.a) = 24amps
I know there has been some discussion about the results not being accurate or something like that. But have received some e-mails asking for this material. So here is the link...
NEC Problems
The problems are in that link. Just in case, I worked the problem with the 2005 version of the NEC.