Ethanol welfare on its last legs

Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum

Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Capt Worley PE

Run silent, run deep
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
13,369
Reaction score
649
Location
SC
One congressman called it a sign that lawmakers are serious about ending "wasteful and unnecessary" subsidies amid hand-wringing in Washington over deficit spending and debt.
“I am pleased the ... senate voted to end the ... ethanol subsidy,” said Congressman Leonard Lance (R-N.J.), a leader in the U.S. House of Representatives to shut off the subsidy that has been carried over annually for more than three decades.

“Today’s vote gives lawmakers on both sides of the U.S. Capitol momentum on this issue. I urge leaders in the U.S. House to bring forth legislation to end the ethanol subsidy once and for all. We must get our nation’s fiscal house in order and eliminating the federal ethanol subsidy will make a significant contribution toward this goal. We must keep the momentum going and follow suit in the House.”

Lance (pictured) said he will demand the House vote on the issue.

To that end, Lance has authored the "Repeal Ethanol Subsidies Today Act." This bipartisan legislation would terminate the ethanol blenders tax credit. The bill has been endorsed by Taxpayers for Common Sense, the National Taxpayers Union and Americans for Limited Government.

In the senate, the Ethanol Subsidy and Tariff Repeal Act was introduced by Sens. Dianne Feinstein, (D-Calif.) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.).

"Ethanol is the only industry that benefits from a triple crown of government intervention: its use is mandated by law, it is protected by tariffs, and companies are paid by the federal government to use it. Ethanol subsidies and tariffs sap our budget, they’re bad for the environment, and they increase our dependence on foreign oil. It’s time we end subsidies that we cannot afford and tariffs that increase gas prices," Feinstein said in a statement on her Web site.

If the subsidy dies because the House and Senate say so, it will eliminate a 45-cent-a-gallon tax subsidy provided for producers of ethanol and delete a 54-cent-a-gallon tariff on imported ethanol. Ethanol is a corn-based alcohol that is an additive to gasoline.

In a statement released Thursday evening, the activist group Friends of the Earth praised the senate for its vote to end the ethanol giveaway.

"This vote is major progress in our fight to end subsidies for environmentally harmful industries -- progress that the pundits, as well as the powerful biofuels and agribusiness lobbies, would have called impossible just two years ago. But Friends of the Earth has been working with a diverse coalition of environmental groups, fiscal conservatives, agricultural interests, food producers and anti-hunger advocates to amass congressional support for ending ethanol giveaways -- and today we won bipartisan support from every corner of the country except the Corn Belt.

"You -- Friends of the Earth members and activists -- own a big piece of this victory. Over the past two years, nearly 30,000 Friends of the Earth activists have taken action to educate policymakers about the environmental costs of corn ethanol and to call on Congress to end these subsidies.

"Today, our voices were heard -- and senators sent a decisive message that the days of the biofuels industry living high off the taxpayers' hog have come to a close."
http://www.torquenews.com/1063/senators-ki...e-mulls-options

About freaking time. I hope it passes the house.

I also hope they start to remove it from motor fuel.

 
I work in this industry and while it will negatively effect some clients I hope it passes.

Expect some increases at the gas pump.

But this should lower the cost of food prices, not only here but worldwide.

 
I pay around 50 cent more per gallon to get non-ethanol gas for my boat. And my boat holds 80 gallons.

 
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday proposed to reduce the amount of ethanol in the nation's fuel supply for the first time, acknowledging that the biofuel law championed by both parties in 2007 is not working as well as expected.

While the proposal highlights the government's struggle to ramp up production of homegrown biofuels that are cleaner-burning than gasoline, but is unlikely to mean much for consumers at the pump.

The change would require almost 3 billion gallons less ethanol and other biofuels to be blended into gasoline in 2014 than the law requires.


More: http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2013/11/15/ethanol-mandate-reducation/3590105/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top