Recent content by Kamba

Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum

Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
  1. K

    AEI Review Class - lateral afternoon practice

    I'm afraid if anything showed up more than single-degree of freedom, I'll be failing the test.. I don't know if it's fair game for dynamic analysis topics to appear in the exam.
  2. K

    VL Exam PM Oct 2019

    Without disclosing any confidential info. What you guys think about the VL PM problems? in specific the concrete problem?
  3. K

    NCEES Problem 601(a)

    linear interaction equations similar to the one used in that problem are valid if the section is un-cracked. when the section is cracked you end up with the interaction diagrams and not just a single line because it accounts for the change in NA location based on the applied moment (tension) and...
  4. K

    NCEES Problem 601(a)

    in NCEES problem 601(a) to design a CMU for axial and flexure, the solution used an interaction equation for combined stresses (Pu/phi.Pn + Mu/phi.Mn). I haven't seen such interaction equation in before in concrete or masonry codes or textbooks. My understanding that this problem should be...
  5. K

    TMS 402/602 2013 : WANTED

    I need TMS 402/602 2013  anybody selling it?
  6. K

    SP-017(14): The Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook

    On my day job, I design steel buildings and I'm not familiar with the ACI codebook. I have spent some time studying using "Design of Reinforced Concrete" by Jack McCormac but I'm not sure if this would be enough. I wonder if it worth spending the time and money going through "SP-017 (14) The...
  7. K

    KL/r >200 in compression FOR A BEAM

    Please refer to AISC 360-10 E2 Commentary. There is a very interesting discussion on the slenderness ratio. It illustrates how the Slenderness ratio started and how it moved from being mandatory to just a recommendation for compression members. Furthermore, flexural members have no limitations...
  8. K

    Lateral Bracing

    Always! Second order analysis is always necessary as per AISC 360-10 C.1. However, You might neglect P-δ as illustrated in AISC 360-10 C.2.1.(2).
  9. K

    ρ vs Ωo

    Zaid: for clarity: it depends on the type of moment resisting frame. what you have mentioned is correct for SMF "Special Moment Frame" that Overstrength factor is used for the design of columns. The case I discussed earlier about connections only applies to OMF "Ordinary Moment Frames".. I'm...
  10. K

    ρ vs Ωo

    in Steel Design is this determined by the "AISC Seismic Design Manual". Speaking of OMF  "Ordinary" moment frame design, Members are designed using 'roo' but connections are designed using 'Omega'. Generally, when it's a critical element (such as connections in OMF) overstrength is used. I'm...
  11. K

    Mp vs Mr (AISC Table 3-2)

    check out Figure 3-1  it all has to do with the unsupported length  (Lu) for the lateral torsional buckling limit state  Mp is the plastic capacity (section will not experience any local buckling) it can achieve the plastic capacity; this occur when Lu <= Lp Mr is the elastic capacity...
  12. K

    For Sale - PE Civil Breath Materials

    ALL Sold.  Thanks
  13. K

    For Sale - PE Civil Breath Materials

    I'm welling to reduce the price or accept any reasonable offers !!
  14. K

    For Sale - PM Construction Materials

    I have sold the above materials. Thanks
Back
Top