Man Rules Violation #2

[Guest]

[rant]

Well, I was out on a date Thursday (not Ms. Applebottoms) and my date asked me ... about # of sexual partners.

I was like .. WHOA!! You can't be asking me for my number on the first date!!! That is client-confidential information!! hmy:

So, I was stuck there for a moment because it came out of left field. I mean, it wasn't like I was going to ask about her number and after all, once I expose mine, is she really going to offer me a fair testament to hers at that point?

Geez ... :smileyballs:

[/rant]

JR

 

[Dexman1349]

My answer is one. I have been with the same girl since 1997... :true:

There are so many ways that question can be answered without saying anything. The better you can distract the girl without actually answering is best.

 

[benbo]

[rant]
Well, I was out on a date Thursday (not Ms. Applebottoms) and my date asked me ... about # of sexual partners.

I was like .. WHOA!! You can't be asking me for my number on the first date!!! That is client-confidential information!! hmy:

So, I was stuck there for a moment because it came out of left field. I mean, it wasn't like I was going to ask about her number and after all, once I expose mine, is she really going to offer me a fair testament to hers at that point?

Geez ... :smileyballs:

[/rant]

JR

How about saying-

"As a mathematician, I would only say that if this date goes as I hope, it is N-1 what it will be tomorrow morning."

I would add, based on the pronouns and the information I know about you, I'm assuming you were on a date with a woman and I don't believe she can technically violate man-rules.

 

[bigray76]

The law of three's... men will mulitpy by three, women will divide by three. Didn't you learn anything from the 40yo virgin???

 

[EM_PS]

Well, I was out on a date Thursday (not Ms. Applebottoms) and my date asked me ... about # of sexual partners.

Well, the good news is you obviously passed the 15 sec determination she made as to whether she would in fact wanna do the unskinny bop w/ you.

A bit on the forward side perhaps. . .. and unfortunately an answer to that question may prompt even nosier questions like 'didja use protection w/ each & every one of them?' - she sounds like she might be a little unsecure, or simply even new to the dating for 'mature adults' routine.

 

[RIP - VTEnviro]

"I'm 37?!?!?!?"

 

[EM_PS]

^ the 5-knuckle shuffle doesn't count

 

[Sschell]

I would add, based on the pronouns and the information I know about you, I'm assuming you were on a date with a woman and I don't believe she can technically violate man-rules.

I would agree... not a man law violation.... unless of course there is something you are not telling us.... however, I would think that team plays by a different set of rules.

 

[mudpuppy]

Hmmmm. . . . maybe she felt intimidated by your obviously enormous prowess and experience in this area.

 

[squishles10]

you can only violate man laws of youre a man. just because you guys have this weird bunch of unwritten rules that you NEVER violate in no way means im going to play along with your game. to amuse yourself i might follow a thread or two discussing them, but thats as far as it goes.

she probably asked bc boinking a virgin is not good. or theres guys like my exroommates new one whos number is in the triple digits. EWWWW.

as long as its reasonable nobody cares.

 

[SSmith]

Well, I was out on a date Thursday (not Ms. Applebottoms) and my date asked me ... about # of sexual partners.

Is there any chance that she knows Ms. Applebottom?

 

[cement]

^^so there is the answer:

more than one, less than 100!

 

[Dark Knight]

Did JR finally eat the bottom of the apple or else?

 

[squishles10]

^^good grief! very nice!

 

[EM_PS]

Generally is agreed there was no Man Law violation here -

You should throw a little Dr. Seuss at her reply thusly: "Should things progress that way, you certainly have a right to know about this , but right now, your right to know is not a 'right-now' right, right?"

 

[RIP - VTEnviro]

I agree that this is an item that should be discussed at some point, preferably before any mattress surfing is involved. If I dated a girl my age I would expect she's been with a few guys, but if her answer was 50 it would raise some red flags.

 

[SSmith]

I agree that this is an item that should be discussed at some point, preferably before any mattress surfing is involved. If I dated a girl my age I would expect she's been with a few guys, but if her answer was 50 it would raise some red flags.

Im sure her first thought would be 'why does he have flags in the bedroom?'

 

[FusionWhite]

The correct answer to that question is:

"My number doesnt matter because by the end of the night its going to be +1 anyway"

 

[Guest]

Is there any chance that she knows Ms. Applebottom?

Nope .. no chance. Completely different circle of influence.

Did JR finally eat the bottom of the apple or else?

Umm .. I am not neither confirming nor denying at this point ...

Generally is agreed there was no Man Law violation here -

Technically, I agree - I was half asleep when I titled the thread. I was just like .. whoa, whoa lady .. you can't be asking me that !!! :blink:

The correct answer to that question is:
"My number doesnt matter because by the end of the night its going to be +1 anyway"

I will remember that response if I find myself in that position again ...

:17:

JR

 

[TXengrChickPE]

the problem with answering that question is that everyone has a different idea of what is "reasonable". I've got friends who have only ever been w/ 1 person... and would think that anything over 5 is "unreasonable". I've got other friends who had their first 10 long before they could vote... they would consider anything in the single digits to be "unreasonable" because of inexperience.