Please help me find a reference to solve this NCEES practice test problem

Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum

Help Support Professional Engineer & PE Exam Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Sparky Bill PE

Senior, Master, Professional, Licensed Electrical
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
303
Reaction score
149
Location
Chattanooga TN
Funny part is I got it right. I "counted the windings" on leg A which was 4 loops and did 3.0/4 = .75 and got the correct answer. After looking at solutions I realized that wasn't AT ALL how I was supposed to solve it. I couldn't find anything in my references (zach stones/ Engr pro guides / wildi/ camera). I'm sure I over looked it. 

image.png

 
I used Electric Machinery and Power System Fundamentals by Chapman for this. I imagine most motors books should cover flux.

Since leg B is shorter than leg C, we know by inspection the flux in B will be greater than C.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I"m not connecting the dots of connecting what you just said to this problem. Is A and C area the same? 
I was just making a note when dealing with flux, φ = BA is a good formula to have on hand. It's not needed for this problem in particular since flux density is not given. However, you may come across a problem requiring use of this equation.

When dealing with flux type questions, a good machinery book will be of value.

In regards to the question you posted, it's really just engineer's intuition that the total flux through leg A is split between legs B and C. And since leg C is 3x the length of Leg B, the flux through C will be 1/4 of the total flux, and the flux through leg B will be 3/4 of the total flux.

You probably won't find this in any reference material. If anything, it might be in a physics book since magnetic flux is usually covered in Physics II for most college curriculums.

 
I was just making a note when dealing with flux, φ = BA is a good formula to have on hand. It's not needed for this problem in particular since flux density is not given. However, you may come across a problem requiring use of this equation.

When dealing with flux type questions, a good machinery book will be of value.

In regards to the question you posted, it's really just engineer's intuition that the total flux through leg A is split between legs B and C. And since leg C is 3x the length of Leg B, the flux through C will be 1/4 of the total flux, and the flux through leg B will be 3/4 of the total flux.

You probably won't find this in any reference material. If anything, it might be in a physics book since magnetic flux is usually covered in Physics II for most college curriculums.
Yeah I looked in my Wildi book and couldn't find anything, I forgot I even had my Chapman book with me, I'll check it tomorrow. 

I'm missing how C is 3x the length of leg B.

If B is "d distance away" from a, why wouldn't C be "2d distance away" ? 

 
Yeah I looked in my Wildi book and couldn't find anything, I forgot I even had my Chapman book with me, I'll check it tomorrow. 

I'm missing how C is 3x the length of leg B.

If B is "d distance away" from a, why wouldn't C be "2d distance away" ? 
Please excuse the crude drawing, but the length of leg B (blue) is d, and the length of leg C (green) is 3d. The physical length of the core path, not the distance from A.

Screenshot_20200125-185934.png

 
So if C is 3/4 and B is 1/4, does the flux in B+C always = A?

I remember covering this in college, but apparently I don't remember this at all. I tried to look it up in my machines book I'm sorry for the questions. 

 
So if C is 3/4 and B is 1/4, does the flux in B+C always = A?

I remember covering this in college, but apparently I don't remember this at all. I tried to look it up in my machines book I'm sorry for the questions. 
No problem.

Yes the total flux (e.g. flux through A) is B+C.

φA = φB + φC

φB = (3/4)φA

φC = (1/4)φA

φB is greater than φC. Just imagine it's because there is more "resistance" in leg C because it's longer.

 
No problem.

Yes the total flux (e.g. flux through A) is B+C.

φA = φB + φC

φB = (3/4)φA

φC = (1/4)φA

φB is greater than φC. Just imagine it's because there is more "resistance" in leg C because it's longer.
Thanks for explaining that!

Now that I get that, it's hard for me to imagine how A doesn't equal C. All I can see is your green part being "mirrored over" and have A=C. I am digging through Wildi/Chapman books right now to see if I can find a section to read up on . 

 
Back
Top