Jump to content
Engineer Boards

Dont end up like this guy..


Recommended Posts

Check out this month's NCEES "Licensure Exchange" newsletter.

Scroll down to page 5, and you'll find an entire article devoted to the smack-down by Tim@NCEES in April for the idiot who posted an exam question. The article goes on to actually mention a lot more about the content of the question than I ever would have thought appropriate.

The true identity of "Tim" is also identified, and coincidentally there is a picture of him on the preceding page.

UPDATE: link in case they archive that issue

http://www.ncees.org/About_NCEES/Licensure...07&month=06

UPDATE 2 (new link):  http://ncees.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/LEx-June-07-for-Web.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Seriously, take my word for it. If you find yourself in a position where you understand my statement, don't proceed any further.

Also, don't try to hack into the exam results notification memo, just trust me on this, even if it was not really intended to be malicious.

NOPE

WOW.

I guess that answers those questions as to what happened. Just kinda sucks that they have our web address wrong. Maybe we should register engineeringboards.com too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Mike in Gastonia @ Jun 27 2007, 09:15 PM)

I would guess they are probably not going to use the question again anyway, so why not?

I guess that's why NCEES has to watch that kind of thing, if you had 80 of those guys, it would cancel out a whole exam, and NCEES would run out of questions for the future.

I hate seeing that happen to the guy, even if he did question my testicular fortitude, but he did blatently say he didn't care, and he posted it like 3 or 4 times.

QUOTE (SapperPE @ Jun 27 2007, 11:33 PM)

We need to put that portion of the PDF file in the "Rules of the Board" as a deterent for future candidates.

Great idea, but NCEES is the last place we need to risk copyright problems. Maybe we'll just add the link and hope they keep it up.

QUOTE (jregieng @ Jun 27 2007, 11:59 PM)

^^^^ smile.gif

JR

LOVING THE KNARLY MAN!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that how it happened? I thought you guys were the ones that let Tim know about the post. Anyways someone was nailed.

What a dumb mistake, but he/she has no one to blame but himself/herself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I am still surprised that I haven’t gotten any hate email from the guy to be honest.

Looks like Tim is getting promoted from one of the articles (Congrats!)

At least they didn’t site.. engineertrades.com ….. I guess we should go register www.engineeringboards.com and have it re-direct here for a few months..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very cool. Definitely gives the board both press and credibility.

I'd suggest that someone PM Tim@NCEES through this board and make him aware that the board URL is incorrect.

Note: It wouldn't be fair to deluge him with PM's, so I'll leave it to the Admins to act.

It's great when you can work with the NCEES and know that you can be heard.

I also applaud that he posted as Tim@NCEES. No covert lurking on thier part, he was straight up front about who he was. Great job all around.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest VA_Env_Engr

Here's another thought. When a new member sign up on this board, we make him read and accept a few major rules of the board before signing him/her on. Kinda like the credit card or other companies do with legal stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites
QUOTE (MA_PE @ Jun 28 2007, 08:43 AM)I also applaud that he posted as Tim@NCEES. No covert lurking on thier part, he was straight up front about who he was. Great job all around.

He was on it pretty fast, so I assumed he must have been reading as a guest or so, NCEES may be on everyday all the time for all we know.

I saw the post almost immediately, so I PM'd the guy who wrote it, and by the time I was done writing that PM, Tim@NCEES had already PM'd me, and by the time I read his, I noticed the guy posted the same thing in about 4 different places.

Link to post
Share on other sites
QUOTE (VA_Env_Engr @ Jun 28 2007, 09:08 AM) Here's another thought. When a new member sign up on this board, we make him read and accept a few major rules of the board before signing him/her on. Kinda like the credit card or other companies do with legal stuff.

That’s a good idea, I added something brief to the registration part that should essentially spell it out for people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for updating the link.

Its still unfortunate that this occurred, I wish the board was not being recognized for something so negative.

Just an FYI, there will be a lot heavier moderation after the next exam, super cool secret mods just to help out in case another unfortunate event happens again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Road Guy @ Jun 28 2007, 09:53 AM)

Its still unfortunate that this occurred, I wish the board was not being recognized for something so negative.

I'm not so sure the board's recognition is so negative. They did point out that the post was only there for 10 or 15 minutes. That's a pretty quick reaction considering that running this board is not your primary occupation. The rules are posted here, they were knowingly broken, the offender paid a price. I would only see it as negative publicity if you had withheld the identity of the nitwit who posted the exam question.

Just my 2cents.gif

Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is serious shit there. A guy probably ruined his life or at least, will have to wait a few years for a promo if he was counting on getting the license. If DVINNY warned him and he still posted the same thing again he deserved it. That shows two things in the way I see it. NCEES really has a vigilant eye on this board and that you guys are serious. That was a quick reaction. I was good that an admin was on the board at that point because who knows what would happened should the post stay a long time. Someone mention about a heavy watch after next test. I suggest a 24 hour watch for a couple of days and I am serious. You never know who might try that stunt again and is your good name on the line. I don't mean to be an ass kisser but I believe in recognition when a great job is done. Great job adms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...