IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



CONGRATS TO:   
z06dustin
House
sgsmith2 PE
PE TO B
Yingli
DishTN
inferno
Sir_007
Wyatt72
Kevin H
alison
RHOSU06
vhmehta
CPuerta
SparksFlyingPE
rmbowen37
JoeysVee
ekd
tucents
kwolla77
chadesullivan
TBSS
redeusebio
nehal10
bhaskarp
Kaldric
deesleuth
civil_engr05
YaGoof
arada
totz
jd2u
jonstone
ble31980
Mike_NC
rppearso
TranspoVA
F. McBagg
CivilHokie
sac_engineer
tymr
GoPack
Papuanomad
guld0017
buick455
mepe_tn
Ajay
NEED2009
Twofrogs
PA Mining Engr
goofychallenge
Gambit
Beego
Linguica101
roman501
Captain Asian Persuasion
Jbsemtner
trees
Hart4515 (Mutha PE PS)
petertrojan
MWCLARK5
for passing the PE!!
Anandraj     loannie     jharris     eedave     A.O.     Celineh     Lord2005     AllBusiness     ok29     ananag     BPatel     mce01     Highlander     AKENGR     BLEU-BERRY     dproco     vedant     eastonpensfan     kmttop     FEfall09EE     biofem2000     Dolphin     Dharma     dumbfroga     gutsyguy     leopard     lara123     Ansul    
for passing the FE!!

EngineerBoards.com            
Passing Members names will be listed here (25 post minimum)
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shunt Trip Circuit Breaker Application
DMB5mil
post Aug 22 2008, 12:54 AM
Post #1


Junior Engineer
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 27-May 08
From: Juneau, AK
Member No.: 2,847
Discipline:Electrical



Hi All,

I'm having trouble understanding the following scenario involving a shunt trip circuit breaker and a fire pump controller I'm mapping out. I've attached a schematic diagram. Here's the story:

A fire pump controller is connected to an automatic transfer switch which is fed from either utility power or by a standby generator as shown in the attachment.

When turned on, the fire pump controller opens the 200/3 breaker in Panel Gen in order to lighten the generator load (Panel N no longer is powered) Both the fire pump controller and generator are at 277/480V.

However, the shunt trip does not happen directly between pump controller and generator. The 20/1, 120V circuit breaker in Panel E is the mix and is somehow providing control. Here is what happens:

If the 20/1 breaker is open, when the fire pump controller is on it does NOT open the 200/3 breaker.
If the 20/1 breaker is closed, when the fire pump controller is on it DOES open the 200/3 breaker.

I can see how the fire pump controller could trip the 200/3 breaker directly (the controller acting as a switch energizes the shunt trip coil of the 200/3 breaker, causing it to open) but how does the 20/1 120V breaker fit in? Why do you suppose it is required? I can't visualize what's going on here.

Is it required because the control voltage within the pump controller is 120V, not 480V?

Any advice is appreciated. If you want to mark up the attached schematic feel free!

Thanks,
Brian

Any guidance, websites, schematics, etc. would be helpful. Maybe I need a good resource for understanding shunt trip circuit breakers...
Attached File(s)
Attached File  Shunt_Trip_Question.pdf ( 13.84K ) Number of downloads: 53
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Twofrogs
post Aug 22 2008, 05:13 AM
Post #2


Field Tech
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 14-March 08
Member No.: 2,511
Discipline:Electrical



QUOTE (DMB5mil @ Aug 21 2008, 06:54 PM) *
Hi All,

I'm having trouble understanding the following scenario involving a shunt trip circuit breaker and a fire pump controller I'm mapping out. I've attached a schematic diagram. Here's the story:

A fire pump controller is connected to an automatic transfer switch which is fed from either utility power or by a standby generator as shown in the attachment.

When turned on, the fire pump controller opens the 200/3 breaker in Panel Gen in order to lighten the generator load (Panel N no longer is powered) Both the fire pump controller and generator are at 277/480V.

However, the shunt trip does not happen directly between pump controller and generator. The 20/1, 120V circuit breaker in Panel E is the mix and is somehow providing control. Here is what happens:

If the 20/1 breaker is open, when the fire pump controller is on it does NOT open the 200/3 breaker.
If the 20/1 breaker is closed, when the fire pump controller is on it DOES open the 200/3 breaker.

I can see how the fire pump controller could trip the 200/3 breaker directly (the controller acting as a switch energizes the shunt trip coil of the 200/3 breaker, causing it to open) but how does the 20/1 120V breaker fit in? Why do you suppose it is required? I can't visualize what's going on here.

Is it required because the control voltage within the pump controller is 120V, not 480V?

Any advice is appreciated. If you want to mark up the attached schematic feel free!

Thanks,
Brian

Any guidance, websites, schematics, etc. would be helpful. Maybe I need a good resource for understanding shunt trip circuit breakers...


It appears that the 120V circuit may be routed through a "normally open" contact on the controller. It does seem odd, since a controller can have a lower voltage control circuit built-in via transformer, with a lock-out circuit ("normally open") available, so tracking down that situation would be warranted. If the 120V circuit off the E panel is used for that purpose, I'd recommend using a lock on the breaker to keep it in the closed position and have it marked accordingly.... though I'd check with the NEC first..... it has been quite some time since I've done design. Other than that, a conversation with the manufacturer could shed more light on the arrangement as well as a getting/creating a relay logic diagram for a better understanding of the existing connections. Hope this helps!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Art
post Aug 23 2008, 03:30 AM
Post #3


Principal in Charge
Group Icon

Group: Veteran
Posts: 279
Joined: 20-June 06
From: Earth
Member No.: 142
Discipline:Electrical



without a schematic (vs power single line) it anybody's guess

mine: it's external power for the shunt trip
they don't want to use the FP controller control power (perhaps code prevents it) because an external fault would disable the pump when you most needed it...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mudpuppy
post Aug 23 2008, 09:06 PM
Post #4


Chief Engineer
Group Icon

Group: Supporting Member
Posts: 2,465
Joined: 16-May 07
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,068
Discipline:Electrical



I think Art is right in that we're taking guesses in the dark, but here is my best guess:

If the utility feed fails and the ATS/E fails to transfer Panel E to the generator, then the 200/3 may not need to be opened to drop Panel N because the load on Panel E has already been dropped. If I am understanding things correctly, this would be accomplished by this scheme because the 20/1 circuit would be deengergized in this scenario (even though the 20/1 breaker is closed) since Panel E would still be connected to the dead utility feed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Art
post Aug 24 2008, 04:07 AM
Post #5


Principal in Charge
Group Icon

Group: Veteran
Posts: 279
Joined: 20-June 06
From: Earth
Member No.: 142
Discipline:Electrical



the way I see it:

normal power available
sufficient oomph to carry N, E and the FP

emergency power-genset/no FP
the genset can carry N & E

emergency power-genset/FP called on
the genset is not large enough to carry N, E and the FP...so N is shunted off

E = Emergency loads
N = normal or non-critical loads, so they are shed...to keep the genset size smaller in the rare event of a power outage and fire

just looked in NFPA 20-6 & NFPA 70-695 (NEC)...any control power source (power for shunt trip CB) must be independent and failure of such shall not prevent the pump from running

btw: the control power source (xfmr) in a FP controller is not protected (fused, etc.) it and the pump/wiring are considered sacrificial...
allow it to run or attempt to until it fails/burns up

This post has been edited by Art: Aug 24 2008, 04:27 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DMB5mil
post Aug 25 2008, 07:43 PM
Post #6


Junior Engineer
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 27-May 08
From: Juneau, AK
Member No.: 2,847
Discipline:Electrical



QUOTE (Art @ Aug 23 2008, 08:07 PM) *
the way I see it:

normal power available
sufficient oomph to carry N, E and the FP

emergency power-genset/no FP
the genset can carry N & E

emergency power-genset/FP called on
the genset is not large enough to carry N, E and the FP...so N is shunted off

E = Emergency loads
N = normal or non-critical loads, so they are shed...to keep the genset size smaller in the rare event of a power outage and fire

just looked in NFPA 20-6 & NFPA 70-695 (NEC)...any control power source (power for shunt trip CB) must be independent and failure of such shall not prevent the pump from running

btw: the control power source (xfmr) in a FP controller is not protected (fused, etc.) it and the pump/wiring are considered sacrificial...
allow it to run or attempt to until it fails/burns up


Thanks for all the replies! I spoke with my manager and he is confident that the 120V, 20/1 breaker is supplying coil voltage to the 200/3 shunt trip as suggested by your replies. The coil is energized by the 20/1 circuit when the contacts from the fire pump controller close.

Per NFPA 20 Section 9.6.2.2 the generator must provide a minimum of 8 hours run time for the fire pump, apart from the other generator loads. My guess is that Panel N is dropped to ensure the generator can run long enough to meet code.

Thanks for your help everyone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 11:43 AM