Presidential Candidate - Who's yours?
#1
Posted 19 December 2011 - 03:45 PM
^ Match-O-Matic website. It asks some questions, then ranks 3 candidates based on your responses.
Mine were:
1. Ron Paul
2. Michelle Bauchman
3. Rick Perry
(for the record, I don't plan on voting for any of those 3)
I found this interesting, so made the thread. Please don't turn this into a full blown FLAMING thread, or I will move it to the political forum.
#2
Posted 19 December 2011 - 03:58 PM
1. Barrack Obama
2. Ron Paul
3. Jon Huntsman
I have no clue who jon huntsman is.
#3
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:06 PM
2) Barack Obama
3) Michelle Bachman
I must be a schizo.
#4
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:11 PM
#5
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:15 PM
1) Barack Obama
2) Newt Gingrich
3) Rick Perry
#6
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:28 PM
1) Barrack Obama
2) Ron Paul
3) Mitt Romney
#7
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:42 PM
#8
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:46 PM
Ron Paul
Newt Gingrich
Rick Perry
#9
Posted 19 December 2011 - 04:56 PM
Michelle Bachmann
Rick Perry
If I had to guess, I'd say that it was Paul by a landslide, and very little of the other two.
#10
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:08 PM
Obama
Huntsman
I'm not surprised.
#11
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:27 PM
2. Bachman
3. Perry
#12
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:31 PM
2. Michelle Bauchman
3. Rick Perry
interesting, but I found a few questions where I could care less about... and it was 4, 3, 3 for what each person was
#13
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:54 PM
2. Michelle Bachmann
3. Ron Paul
#14
Posted 19 December 2011 - 06:05 PM
2. Newt Gingrich
3. Michele Bachmann
#15
Posted 19 December 2011 - 06:05 PM
Perry
Gingrich
Wouldn't even consider the first two, so I guess my choice is rather limited....
#16
Posted 19 December 2011 - 06:37 PM
At the conclusion of the quiz, there's a graphic at the top of the page that shows which representatives belong to each of your responses (at least the top 3).Ron Paul
Michelle Bachmann
Rick Perry
If I had to guess, I'd say that it was Paul by a landslide, and very little of the other two.
#17
Posted 19 December 2011 - 06:43 PM
And Cthulhu wasn't listed.
#18
Posted 19 December 2011 - 06:51 PM
Perry (3)
Gingrich (2)
#19
Posted 19 December 2011 - 07:00 PM
2. Paul
3. Gingrich
3 checks for each of them.
#20
Posted 19 December 2011 - 07:16 PM
2.Cthulhu
3. Dleg
Just kidding
1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. Perry
#21
Posted 19 December 2011 - 07:23 PM
Probably better choices than anyone running in 2012.1. Spaghetti Monster
2.Cthulhu
3. Dleg
#22
Posted 19 December 2011 - 07:49 PM
#23
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:19 PM
So there is. I was 7 for Paul, 4 for Bachmann, and 3 for Perry. 1 was shared between Bachmann and Perry and 1 was shared between all 3.At the conclusion of the quiz, there's a graphic at the top of the page that shows which representatives belong to each of your responses (at least the top 3).
Ron Paul
Michelle Bachmann
Rick Perry
If I had to guess, I'd say that it was Paul by a landslide, and very little of the other two.
#24
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:25 PM
2. Bachmann
3. Perry
I would hold my nose on Gingrich, Bachmann wont be in 1 month from now and I dont think America is ready for another TX president. I do, however, wish Santorum could get elected and he would get my vote. I'm afraid he, Paul and Huntsman are all in the third or forth teir however.
#25
Posted 19 December 2011 - 09:16 PM
So what you're saying is that we should cut all defense spending?
#26
Posted 19 December 2011 - 09:46 PM
#27
Posted 19 December 2011 - 10:36 PM
#28
Posted 19 December 2011 - 11:58 PM
Well played sir.
So what you're saying is that we should cut all defense spending?
#29
Posted 20 December 2011 - 01:46 PM
I will be honest... I had to just google that to figure out what you were talking about
Ditto on that.
#30
Posted 20 December 2011 - 03:03 PM
I will be honest... I had to just google that to figure out what you were talking about
Ditto on that.
#31
Posted 20 December 2011 - 05:15 PM
Well played sir.
So what you're saying is that we should cut all defense spending?
Haha, awesome. It's time we go on the offensive! Or you know, something.
#32
Posted 20 December 2011 - 07:40 PM
2. Huntsman
3. Bachman
An odder 3 you might not ever see.
#33
Posted 21 December 2011 - 03:19 PM
Tin foil hat time - is ABC trying to get people to believe their views are in line with the president's?
#34
Posted 21 December 2011 - 03:51 PM
Tin foil hat my ass. Fox News pundits, Iowa's governor and writers for Politico are outright telling people to ignore it if Ron Paul wins the Iowa primary. WTF? Who are they to tell people who is a viable candidate? If Ron Paul has the ability to carry a primary, why couldn't he win the nomination and presidency?Tin foil hat time - is ABC trying to get people to believe their views are in line with the president's?
Source: http://www.infowars....inishes-second/
#35
Posted 21 December 2011 - 03:54 PM
#36
Posted 21 December 2011 - 04:34 PM
To those with Obama at or near the top, would you really vote for him?
I have no idea at this time. It depends on how bad the other candidates are. And that could be saying a lot.
#37
Posted 21 December 2011 - 04:44 PM
#38
Posted 21 December 2011 - 04:46 PM
depends on what the choices are from the republicans. although in IL elections are messed up seeing as our governor only won 2-3 counties out of the 107 in the state and still won by sheer population of Chicago.To those with Obama at or near the top, would you really vote for him?
Tin foil hat time - is ABC trying to get people to believe their views are in line with the president's?
#39
Posted 21 December 2011 - 04:47 PM
Can I pencil in "none of the above" when I vote next November?
Richard Pryor isn't even running.
#40
Posted 21 December 2011 - 05:38 PM
To those with Obama at or near the top, would you really vote for him?
I have no idea at this time. It depends on how bad the other candidates are. And that could be saying a lot.
#41
Posted 21 December 2011 - 11:30 PM
#42
Posted 22 December 2011 - 01:23 PM
1. Ron Paul
2. Michelle Bauchman
3. Rick Perry
#43
Posted 22 December 2011 - 02:17 PM
I would hope they no one would choose their candidate based on this simplistic "tool". My biggest gripe is that it weighs all the topics it presents equally, which isn't how a person is likely to make their decision in real life, which leads me to my point on your second question...Tin foil hat time - is ABC trying to get people to believe their views are in line with the president's?
Obama is near the top of my list using this tool simply because my views align best with Obama's on the "Hot Topic's" items that are presented here (which comprise 4 of the 11 questions). Since this tool weighs all the categories equally, I have a large portion of my selections match Obama's even though i don't agree with him on any of what I feel are the more important topics of the economy, health care, and national security. For those topics my views match up with several of the other candidates, but don't really gravitate towards one in particular. Thus, by default, this site says I should vote for Obama, even though I'm not likely to.To those with Obama at or near the top, would you really vote for him?
#44
Posted 22 December 2011 - 02:45 PM
OBAMA - 0
ROMNEY - 1
(Copy that above, change it to add your vote and paste)
#45
Posted 22 December 2011 - 02:53 PM
I would hope they no one would choose their candidate based on this simplistic "tool". My biggest gripe is that it weighs all the topics it presents equally, which isn't how a person is likely to make their decision in real life, which leads me to my point on your second question...
Tin foil hat time - is ABC trying to get people to believe their views are in line with the president's?
Obama is near the top of my list using this tool simply because my views align best with Obama's on the "Hot Topic's" items that are presented here (which comprise 4 of the 11 questions). Since this tool weighs all the categories equally, I have a large portion of my selections match Obama's even though i don't agree with him on any of what I feel are the more important topics of the economy, health care, and national security. For those topics my views match up with several of the other candidates, but don't really gravitate towards one in particular. Thus, by default, this site says I should vote for Obama, even though I'm not likely to.To those with Obama at or near the top, would you really vote for him?
Who's to say the young, hip, social-media, Kool-Aid drinkers of "hope" and "change" who voted him in the office in the first place wouldn't see this quiz as the soothsayer of voting? This is the reason behind the posing of my questions.
Hmmm... my views match those of the president. I guess I'll vote for him.
Is that an unreasonable thought of what may happen?
#46
Posted 22 December 2011 - 02:55 PM
Who's to say the young, hip, social-media, Kool-Aid drinkers of "hope" and "change" who voted him in the office in the first place wouldn't see this quiz as the soothsayer of voting? This is the reason behind the posing of my questions.
Hmmm... my views match those of the president. I guess I'll vote for him.
Is that an unreasonable thought of what may happen?
I'm not saying that won't happen, I just hope it won't.
#47
Posted 22 December 2011 - 03:14 PM
#48
Posted 22 December 2011 - 03:40 PM
Romney - 2
(crossing fingers it wont be Romney)
#49
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:42 PM
Dleg - 1
#50
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:46 PM
Obama - 0
Dleg - 1000
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










